| Author |
Replies: 8 / Views: 1,435 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
Yesterday RealPeso sent me a note from this forum asking about the chances of an 1825 Iturbide Peso being a counterfeit. I tried to use the link provided to reply but I received a notice saying it was undeliverable. So I decided to post the ebay auction here. Here is the auction. https://www.ebay.com/itm/1825-AUGUS...303423021655Any comments before I write my 2 cents?
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
262 Posts |
I know nothing about the series, but what in the world is going on between the eagle's head and the legend? Certainly one that I would avoid.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1156 Posts |
That would be a unlikely target for a counterfeit -- a numismatic forgery, however, is certainly possible.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5362 Posts |
PatAR Those lumps would require an examination under a microscope before making a definitive comment. Just of the top of my head they could be due to a couple things. 1. Could be traces of an old mount (solder etc.) 2. Could be an indication of a cast copy (hole in mold). Here is a portion of the ebay picture that shows the lumps.  Here is a portion of a graded coin showing the same area. jgenn I agree that an 1825 Iturbide would be a very unlikely target. The primary reason being that the date makes no sense. No 1825 Iturbide coins were ever made. So why make a coin that never existed even as a numismatic forgery?
|
|
New Member
United States
26 Posts |
Not my series, but looks cast. And the date looks to be 1823, but softly rendered.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
684 Posts |
I agree With Vicky that it looks cast and is dated 1823. It is Buttrey Hubbard Obverse 4 Reverse C. The legends are in the right place and characters are of correct style but very incomplete. The bust looks pretty good except that the bottom the neck is a bit rounded. Probably an incomplete casting die transfer.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts |
This thread should step back, do a shot, take a deep breath and restart itself, no?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5362 Posts |
VickySilver I was wondering when someone would point that out. The seller is wrong in saying the date is 1825 - it is 1823. There is damage between the upper and lower sections of the 3 which causes it to resemble a 5 when viewed with the un-aided eye. Westwood Arms The coin is in fact a Numismatic Forgery which I actually own a copy of. The coin that was copied was a slightly rotated double strike that mangled many of the letters. I recognized the mint mark. The coin is a worthless modern fake. I advised the seller of all of these issues before I started this thread. There has been no reply from the seller thus far. Contemporary Counterfeits of the Iturbide 8R do exist but they are rare. I have seen only 2 appear at auction in the past 20 years. Both sold for more than $800. I own one of the two. It appears as the plate coin at the top of page 501 of my book. It is the GNL 1822 Obverse N Reverse MoJM-001. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
426 Posts |
Thank you Swamperbob for taking a look at it and for alerting me to the undeliverable email.
Edited by RealPeso 02/06/2020 10:49 pm
|
| |
Replies: 8 / Views: 1,435 |
|