| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,079 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3640 Posts |
Hi I was a little reluctant to post this but wanted some input first. An acquantaince and business associate of mine from ohio (an avid copper cent collector) he has them all plus some. Anyway, he has in his possession (cherrypicked) one 1946 steel cent as well as a 1942. As far as we both know there was never a 46 steel found. He is not quite sure what to do about the 46 as of now. He wanted to send it out to anacs for certification etc. Any ideas on what to do with these coins or other info would be appreciated. I have two printed out pic. copies of the 46 that he took with a regular 35 mm camera. I will scan them and post. Not sure how they will look but? The coin was weighed, measured etc. and all was within the norm for a 43 steel. It has one slight ding where he thought maybe at one time someone may of tried to authenticate the alloy beneath the surface. The only real difference is that this coin does not have as strong of a magnetic pull to it as the norm. It can be picked up on egde or either side completely with a magnet not just as strong or as firmly. It will not shake off the maget either. If anyone out there knows of these coins any more info would help. I will post the obv. and rev. scans this evening. Thank's http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2008...06/46obv.jpghttp://img.villagephotos.com/p/2008...06/46rev.jpgEdited by Indian1 10/21/2008 8:51 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3098 Posts |
Wow! If it is a genuine 46 steel, the it is a true rarity!
I will be eager to see the pictures!
Also, steel is supposed to have very strong attraction to a magnet. From what you're saying, the only way I can think that it wouldn't have that strong of an attraction is that maybe a intricate counterfeit from steel and aluminum alloys, but I don't think anyone would counterfeit a penny, and especially make it that different from the rest.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
Most likely plated with a magnetic metal. Neither is known to exist.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3640 Posts |
Yes, that is correct neither is known to exist at least up to possibly now ? The haze on both sides is slight wear on the plating. That gouge I mentioned is on the lower obverse rim area (V notch) Close examination of the notch shows underlying steel with the regular plating. Owners observation.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
Still looks fishy to me. I'm still thinking it's just a normal cent that was plated...after the notch was cut into it.
This would be one that would have to go to a gram scale to know much of anything. If it's near or above 3.11 grams, then my suspition is correct.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3640 Posts |
I will send him a note to accurately weigh it. I have a jewelers scale myself but not the coin in hand. :) My weights are: 43 steel 2.6 up to 2.8 on average. 46 copper 3.0 - 3.2 avg. Some of each will go 2.9 though. pretty close as far as the spread. Meaning that you could have a steel and a 46 copper that are exactly the same weight. Will post when I get the exact weight of the coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3098 Posts |
What makes me more suspicious is that it was minted in 1946, 3 years after the steel planchets were made. I don't think any planchet would stay in the milling machine that long.
Or.... the other conspiratory theory is that one of the mint workers switched one of the planchets in the machines with a steel planchet, and restruck it with a 1946 die. I know it should show some makrs of the 1943 cent, but does this seem plausible?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3640 Posts |
Both of those scenarios as well as a few others like it are possible. Back then the housekeeping was not as good as it is today at the mint. A planchet could of been stuck in a bin for 3 years and not even noticed. Got filled one day in 46 and was emptied and jarred loose. Many coins are out there or owned now that even minted longer than 3 yrs. after they were collared. Some foreign coin planchets that were used in the 80's by the U.S. mint got mixed up years later and were punched as u.s. coins. And even the worker theory could hold water. A very fat chance on any of the above but possible. That would still make it a very rare error coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
It's plated. There is no doubt about it. There is a look to a plated coin that just jumps out at you after you've seen enough of them.
Based upon the pictures, the plating was done to the coin after it had seen some wear. In other words, the wear is covered by the plating. If the coin were really struck on a zinc coated, steel planchet, it would just exhibit natural wear patterns and some rust.
This coin does not.
Thanks, Bill
Edited by foundinrolls 10/21/2008 11:54 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3640 Posts |
Note from the owner:
Well, the way I look at it. They notched the rim to see what it was like under the plating. Don't forget, that is not a 43, but a 46. Also, since I don't know what the planchet is made of, I can't be sure what the weight should be since it is a foreign planchet. It is less magnetic than a 43 steel, so the mix of alloys could be different. Don't know what they used for 46 foreign planchets. I do have a very accurate scale that is accurate to 1/10th of a gram. The actual weight on this penny is closer to 3.5. Won't ever know the content until I get it checked out. Then there is the 42 which had a weird hue to it. Steel shiny with a tint of copper and ever so slightly magnetic. Then the 43S that looks charcoal in color that weighs in at 4.4 grams. So there is some weird stuff out there.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2540 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
666 Posts |
It has the look of plating to me.
If you look at the reverse, the wear signs are such that there should be separation between the wheat lines but there isn't as much as I think there should be.
I'm also thinking the color is off as well... It just looks plated. Probably plated post a little circulation.
Of course this is JMO. If the collector is truly interested I'd have him send it to ANACS.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
It's a waste of time and money to send it anywhere. It is not a coin struck on a foreign foreign planchet.
It could even be spray paint.
Also, since the owner of the coin wasn't there when it was plated, how does he know the nick on the rim was done after the plating as a test.
The nick is circulation damage that occurred before the plating then got covered by the plating.
Anyway. Have fun, just a friendly comment:-).....don't spend too much money to find out what we suggested for free:-)
Have Fun, Bill
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3640 Posts |
Hi I appreciate all the help. Just talked with the owner. Those pics. I have posted are 200 dpi scans of a printed out copy from a regular camera pic not a digital. I asked him about the wheat lines: "This 46 steely has full unbroken deep perfect lines" This was in reply to the thread about what was seen in the pic. He got the coin with the nick in it. Never said it was there before or after. I think a reasonable assumption on his part that maybe someone cut that in to try to identify the core etc. at one time after it was minted naturally. Either one of us are stating it is a genuine 46 steely. Just wanted some onfo on what foreign coins, if any were minted that year. That would help narrow down what it may be. Why would anyone go to all that trouble and work to make a perfectly plated 1946 cent. A 44 maybe ? The 42 he has he agrees is most likely just plated as it is a botch job. The 43-S is strange especially that heavy weight. I was just trying to help him out. Seems like if there is a possibility of having something possibly original the old - it does not exist rings out all the time. You'll never find anything new if you think like that. Not looking to set the world on fire or anything but it raises possibilities that may exist out there. I do not know if any of you out there own every Wheat cent and variety / error that has been known. This man of 64 yrs. of age does.(not me) Just because one is not savy with the computer or dig. cameras etc. does not mean they are uninformed about their hobby. The moderator can put this post to sleep now if he wishes. I'd be happy to find a 42,43-S,46 and a few more steel cents plated or not.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
860 Posts |
I agree with the plating/replating comments. Plating would cover up any minor tooling marks from altering or replacing the last digit of the coin. The altered magnetic property is probably the most significant physical point. But mysteries are always interesting!
Jim
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote: The actual weight on this penny is closer to 3.5. End of story. This thing is a couple tenths of a gram over spec for a COPPER cent and a full gram overweight for a steel cent, plus it isn't STRONGLY attracted to a magnet. Heavy weight copper cent with a heavy nickel plating. Accounts for the weight, the color, and the weak to mild magnetic attraction. (And steel cent blanks wouldn't have to be in the machinery for three years, just two at the most because they used the same planchets for 1944 Belgium 2 Francs coins struck at the Philadelphia mint and I think they struck some of the 1944 coins in 1945 as well.) The only coin the US Mint struck in 1946 with a magnetic composition was the Ecuador 1 Sucre. It weighed 7 grams, was 26 mm in diameter and was made of pure nickel so it would be STRONGLY magnetic.
Edited by Conder101 10/23/2008 7:10 pm
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,079 |
|