| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,252 |
|
|
New Member
United States
15 Posts |
These are rare correct I just found it the other day. 
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
15 Posts |
I know theoretically there could be something weighing 0.6 grams on the scale that's out of the croped image zone but it's legit.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34428 Posts |
@tnotp, we trust you when you say it weighs 3.1g. Remember that in 1982, the mint made both solid copper and copper-plated zinc cents. Yours is copper and weighs what it should (not a mint error).
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
  to the CCF!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3003 Posts |
From the blurry picture it looks like a LARGE DATE.
|
|
New Member
 United States
15 Posts |
But they switched to zinc this year so shouldn't it weight 2.5 grams?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34428 Posts |
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74718 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
 hard to see, but clear enough to tell that what you have is a large date, not the extremely valuable small date 82-D copper. There are only 3 or 4 82-D small date coppers known. They were all caught in the wild, so there are probably more out there waiting to be found! Happy hunting!  to the CCF!
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,252 |
|