agreed about the strike however some 21(P)'s are weak particularly the reverse. technically AU58 however the obverse eye appeal is going to push it down to AU55
Well I don't think I've ever disagreed with any assessment on any of my dollars I've submitted so far, but I do on this one. Where do either of you see any wear? It has full cartwheels, 100% full luster. I'm still working on getting the best pictures, but there is no rub or wear anywhere on this coin. An I always try and see how PCGS or NGC sees certain years, and as an example I'm including photos from a NGC 1921 MS-63 graded Morgan. The same weak breast, the same weak strike above her ear. So far be it from me disagreeing with you all, but I do this time.
Quote: NGC example appears to have quite a bit more luster, but that could just be the photos.
That's the hardest thing for me yet in taking these pictures, is getting all the luster and cartwheeling to show without over exposing the coin and having it all look washed out.
Take a look at the large hair curl behind her neck (on both your coin and the slabbed example) I think you'll see the wear/rub at would bring your coin to an AU+ dollar
Edited: looks like Zurie and I saw the same thing at the same time..
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use