Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Lincoln 1983 Partial Date On Reverse?. 2.5g Zinc

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 26 / Views: 2,646Next Topic
Page: of 2
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 07/25/2020  7:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Note any devices you see on the coin are mirrored. They were transferred from other coins when three coins are squeezed in a vise:
Lincoln-1983-Partial-Date-On-Reverse?.-2.5g-Zinc
We see this all the time. Not the first example posted he and won't be the last. Just now a damaged coin. More on to another coin.
New Member
United States
37 Posts
 Posted 07/25/2020  8:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add 1943Copper to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
coop, Thanks for your response and examples. I do see what you mean about clamping or using a vice to transfer images, and I have no idea what the possibilities could be with respect to outcomes for these techniques. I'm not about to try, but maybe if I did I could gain a better understand of them. That being said, I know the 2D images don't represent the true coin. Hypothetically, if you yourself had the coin in hand and were able to determine in 3D the hatching marks above the word LIBERTY were indeed stress marks, and the word LIBERTY was lightly struck on the LIB and heavily struck on half of the E, and mildly to heavily struck on the RTY. Would that not conflict with the vise theory? Any response is appreciated. Respectfully,
Pillar of the Community
captaincoffee's Avatar
United States
600 Posts
 Posted 07/25/2020  11:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add captaincoffee to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm having trouble understanding what you mean by the light/heavy struck LiB-E-RTY question. We can't recreate the exact scenario under which someone made this in a vice or via other means. I was curious, and just took two pennies and smacked them together with a sledgehammer. One of them looks surprisingly unaffected aside from small scratches, and the other looks similar to the obverse of your coin. There would be a lot of variation if someone was messing with around with coins for fun like this. We can be confident, however, that it didn't come from the mint this way.
Bedrock of the Community
merclover's Avatar
United States
10635 Posts
 Posted 07/25/2020  11:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add merclover to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
NOT a mint error. It was done for kick's by some bored teenager in this parents basement. Deliberate post mint vise job. I don't think you like our answers, but we have seen LOTS of these. This coin did NOT leave the mint looking like this, please believe us.


New Member
United States
37 Posts
 Posted 07/26/2020  12:31 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add 1943Copper to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
captaincoffee, thanks for your response. What I meant by light and heavy struck is that the letters are raised higher as if they were smashed deeper into the die. While the rim is flatter and lower above "GOD". All of the letters along the press line from the front of the coin have a deeper strike If you look across the coin on a flat plane across the front, you can see the raised lettering as if the coin was struck from the rear and pressed deeper into the die only in those areas.
That's really the best I can explain it. I believe if it were in a vise, those letters on the obverse would be crushed or less tall, not the tallest deepest strike.
New Member
United States
37 Posts
 Posted 07/26/2020  12:38 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add 1943Copper to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
merclover, thanks for your reply. I don't doubt that it's a possibility someone was messing around. And I do really appreciate the suggestions as to how this coin was deformed.
I'm simply trying to argue my case as to why and how I believe this may have happened at the mint. Just looking for explanations. And still trying to understand what a MAD clash is and exactly how it's formed. Thanks
Pillar of the Community
Ty2020b's Avatar
United States
4680 Posts
 Posted 07/26/2020  02:19 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ty2020b to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
No offense but I think just about every explanation has been given. It is PMD. There is no other way to get an incuse, reversed image onto that coin other than another cent being hammered, smashed, clamped etc. against that one.

As for your MAD clash inquiry.
https://www.maddieclashes.com/19-2/
Edited by Ty2020b
07/26/2020 02:21 am
New Member
United States
37 Posts
 Posted 07/26/2020  02:49 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add 1943Copper to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Ty2020b, Thanks for your reply and link. I'll put this issue to rest. Thank you everyone for your participation to this inquiry.
Pillar of the Community
SilverCents's Avatar
United States
3281 Posts
 Posted 07/28/2020  8:23 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SilverCents to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Watch your tongue 1943Copper, or you'll get it snagged on something unsavory. No one appreciates mockery, me more than most.

So please refrain from attempting to push my buttons, or anyone else's for that matter.

If you continue, staff will make sure you don't.

Edited by SilverCents
07/28/2020 8:26 pm
New Member
United States
37 Posts
 Posted 07/28/2020  8:48 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add 1943Copper to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
SilverCents, My apologies. Would you consede that there was no need for either one of those comments? Respectfully
Pillar of the Community
SilverCents's Avatar
United States
3281 Posts
 Posted 07/28/2020  9:37 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SilverCents to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It's alright. I just tend to be more resistant against disrespect, even if not intentional. Yes I will consede that. I overreacted a tad bit.

Have a good day.
  Previous TopicReplies: 26 / Views: 2,646Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.28 seconds to rattle this change. Forums