| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 3,205 |
|
|
New Member
United States
5 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 to CCF. Photo of reverse please. Also,please crop photos before posting. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1913 Posts |
Did you compare the reading with certified calibration weights? Or some other known weight? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4618 Posts |
 to the CCF! Please post full images of each coin, both sides. Crop them to show only the coin, but try not to cut off any of the coin rims or edges. The coin is showing lots of wear, but not enough to account for this much of a difference in weight. The reverse image will help with members with opinions as to what's up with the coin. 
ANA ID: 3203813 - CONECA ID: N-5637 Clean a coin that may be worth collecting? Please DON'T! When in doubt, leave it dirty!! 
|
|
New Member
 United States
5 Posts |
my scale is totally calibrated,the other strange thing is when the coin is dropped it sounds totally different,almost like silver,that's how I discovered it  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1913 Posts |
This has been a topic in a variety of online forums having numerous suggestions. What is the weight, diameter and thickness? Is the planchet thin or tapered?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Might just have been stamped from thin stock to begin with.  to the CCF!
|
|
New Member
 United States
5 Posts |
that may be,but what makes it sound like silver when you drop it on the table next to a silver dime,and are there any other know coins weighing in at 2.3 that are struck on a thin planchet? if so please let me know
|
|
New Member
 United States
5 Posts |
could it possibly be a genuine mint error,like the 1974 aluminum,or the 1943 copper?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Quote: could it possibly be a genuine mint error,like the 1974 aluminum,or the 1943 copper? No. I think it is a rolled thin planchet and circulation wear. 2.3 grams of silver will not sound the same as 2.3 grams of copper when dropped. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1913 Posts |
We still don't know what the thickness is from the OP. As far as sound goes, that is subjective and influenced by the listeners ear and the surface dropped on. I'd do a specific gravity test, just as part of testing. Perhaps a blend of salvaged cartridge cases & copper. Could be a mint error (thin planchet) as that is one possibility among others on other forums.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
How about a side edge view with this coin between two others in a stack of 3. That would show the thickness of the planchet. It looks like the 1:00-2:00 obverse area is thinner?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
I agree with Coinfrog. I'd bet a rolled thin planchet to begin with. I also agree sound is very, very subjective.  to the CCF! 
|
|
New Member
 United States
5 Posts |
k thanks for the input,ill keep trying
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188187 Posts |
 to the Community!
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 3,205 |
|