| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 3,462 |
|
Valued Member
United States
292 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Sure looks like it, nice pics. Must be a Seated Liberty Half fan on the forum. I don't own the principal work on this series.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2334 Posts |
Truly an interesting coin... Considering they didn't make a 54...I have no idea where the 4 would have come from? Hopefully one of the experts will be by soon to shed some light. What did you end up paying for it? Hope it's real... smat
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
292 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Very interesting, and a great catch. A relatively clear 4. Unfortunately I don't have any input in this series either, but I'm sure someone will.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
745 Posts |
Very interesting coin. A 1860/54-S
Tim Hughes
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
292 Posts |
Actually, Tim, I just thought the same thing when I looked at the 6. It has some metal along the top that could be the top of a 5.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
292 Posts |
Sorry, messed that up. There was no 54-S. the last coin with the 4 in the last digit place was either the 1844-O, or the 1844-P.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
824 Posts |
Well, very interesting. I am surprised that no one else said this, It is a fake! The SF Mints first year for the half was 1855 and there is no SF mint half dollar with the mintmark in that position. How many reeds are there. What is the weight?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
745 Posts |
Yes it could very well be a fake, but remember the SF mint was looking for dies so they could have used a 1854 obverse die, removed the date and repunched the 1860 date on the die while using a reverse die from a previous year
Tim Hughes
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
Do you have a better picture of the obverse, and the whole date? I don't know much about these, but NGC says only two die pairs are known. I looked through about 20 on Heritage and the date doesn't match any. Top of 1 seems too flat, loops inside the 8, top of the 6 has such a distinctly round knob not seen on any HA examples, and the space between 8 and 6. I'm not saying it's fake, but a counterfeiter would also polish off the date before punching another one. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4692 Posts |
If counterfeit it would likely not be to fool a collector but to circulate. Perhaps the op can provide the weight and give it a ring test since there would not be a reason for a counterfeit to be made from .900 silver. The reverse lettering seems suspicious also.
Edited by jimbucks 09/28/2020 12:40 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
If this is a fake, it's extremely interesting. I'd imagine it'd garner the attention of both counterfeit collectors and non counterfeit collectors alike.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
Huh, maybe it's this contemporary counterfeit. http://www.lsccweb.org/cfhalves/1860s_101page.htm"Date clearly shows an 0 over 4 overdate considering the specimen's lower grade." The discrepancies in the date I mentioned above seem to match up, as well as the reverse mentioned by @jimbucks. It's supposed to be "white metal alloy", which would make sense.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2334 Posts |
Wow...nice work kbbpll!! Where did you even find this info? smat
|
| |
Replies: 19 / Views: 3,462 |