| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,546 |
|
|
New Member
United States
41 Posts |
Hey folks. Currently in an ICG slab but I'm thinking of transferring to NGC. I really like the die flow lines on this one, not to mention the toning.  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5669 Posts |
Beautiful peripheral toning and excellent luster in a very late state die. Some areas of strike weakness, but I don't see any signs of wear. I'd say MS-64. (It's an O-113a if you're interested.)
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Don't see any wear, wouldn't be surprised at ICG 65.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Nice! I'll say MS-64, ICG probably graded higher.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2334 Posts |
 she a beauty! smat
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
I will go with MS-65, but struck on a very imperfect planchet. Possible planchet damage before striking? It may? be underweight. Worth checking. If so, then an error coin.
|
|
New Member
 United States
41 Posts |
Thanks everyone! ICG gave it a 64, so this thread's consensus is on the money. I'll let you all know what NGC says if I do transfer.
Zurie, thanks for the Overton, I was indeed curious.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18663 Posts |
i find it an interesting and attractive coin. at first I thought AU58 but the weak strikes on these coins can sometimes fool the best graders. I think NGC may knock it a point for strike so I think it could come back as MS63
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36744 Posts |
Looks like some very light circulation. AU-58.
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,546 |
|