| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,134 |
|
|
New Member
United States
15 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
404 Posts |
Not UNC, many contact marks, and some evidence of wear on the high points. I am also not an expert on this type, but grading generally, I would say high EF-low AU (aggregate AU-50), but leaning toward the lower end of that range, ie: EF-45.
Edited by norantyki 01/18/2021 12:39 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19202 Posts |
Nice example. I'm thinking AU50++.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
AU-53, maybe AU-55, a fun find
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
AU-50, 53 John1 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Nice condition for the first year of the Jefferson nickel . Agree with majority, AU . 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Same here.  to the CCF!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2145 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
15 Posts |
So, not even worth thinking about getting graded?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
9164 Posts |
AU55 no do not get it graded
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
AU50 as well. To justify costs of grading, this would need to be high MS to send in. Keep it as is, or send it back into the wild for someone else to find 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6600 Posts |
The last 2 photos make the coin look polished.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
15 Posts |
keith12, the last 2 photos are of it in a flip with the plastic layer over it.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,134 |
|