@Stafff: Thank you for the edit. I'll strive to make such unnecessary in future.
@coop:
I Googled SBS. It returned:
Acronym Definition
SBS Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene
SBS Short Bowel Syndrome
SBS Siemens Business Services
SBS Seoul Broadcasting System
130 more rows
I'm torn between the first two with a slight inclination not to try the second on my computer.
Without question, you are a highly skilled visual educator in the field of numismatics. I know more than I did before attending to your post. Still, I was not clueless in my entirety before reading your thoughtful treatise.
I've actually become somewhat adept at distinguishing forms of doubling on coin devices. I have a number of coins struck by doubled dies. I ran few past Paul Hanan (CONECA), Rick Snow, and NGC.
My "somewhat" adeptness prompted me not to approach the term "doubled die" in my post. My short time on CCF has taught me to keep my own counsel else court mockery. I'm going to ignore what I've been taught and say what I see. I think this is a 1943/3. Will @coop consider such possibility? What do others think? (I've never heard of one, either!)
More images, perhaps? I thought five was overdoing.
Kevin
@coop:
Quote:
If you can't make SBS on your computer.
If you can't make SBS on your computer.
I Googled SBS. It returned:
Acronym Definition
SBS Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene
SBS Short Bowel Syndrome
SBS Siemens Business Services
SBS Seoul Broadcasting System
130 more rows
I'm torn between the first two with a slight inclination not to try the second on my computer.
Without question, you are a highly skilled visual educator in the field of numismatics. I know more than I did before attending to your post. Still, I was not clueless in my entirety before reading your thoughtful treatise.
I've actually become somewhat adept at distinguishing forms of doubling on coin devices. I have a number of coins struck by doubled dies. I ran few past Paul Hanan (CONECA), Rick Snow, and NGC.
My "somewhat" adeptness prompted me not to approach the term "doubled die" in my post. My short time on CCF has taught me to keep my own counsel else court mockery. I'm going to ignore what I've been taught and say what I see. I think this is a 1943/3. Will @coop consider such possibility? What do others think? (I've never heard of one, either!)
More images, perhaps? I thought five was overdoing.
Kevin




































