Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1982 Nickel RPM Appears As A D And S Upper Left

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 2,365Next Topic  
Valued Member
Chip chatters's Avatar
184 Posts
 Posted 04/08/2021  06:24 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Chip chatters to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
rpm in wexler's catalog?
Any opinions would be welcome

1982-Nickel-RPM-Appears-As-A-D-And-S-Upper-Left
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 04/08/2021  06:44 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
to CCF. Need much better photos to really help you. What attribution number do you think it is?
John1
Valued Member
Chip chatters's Avatar
184 Posts
 Posted 04/08/2021  07:02 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Chip chatters to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Why I really don't know
Bedrock of the Community
ijn1944's Avatar
United States
19176 Posts
 Posted 04/08/2021  07:21 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ijn1944 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, better photos needed. The image posted appears to be a blow-up of a somewhat low resolution image (perhaps low resolution jpeg). Might be a good idea to post full, large and sharp pics of the coin's obverse and reverse too. This would help establish the full context for what we're looking at. Thanks.
Valued Member
Chip chatters's Avatar
184 Posts
 Posted 04/08/2021  07:54 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Chip chatters to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Ok thanks
Pillar of the Community
td5173's Avatar
United States
565 Posts
 Posted 04/08/2021  08:32 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add td5173 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
When you do a new post there is a little button at the bottom that says preview. That way you can see you picture before you post it and make adjustments as needed.
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 04/08/2021  08:40 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This mintmark is caused by by a damaged/disfigured mintmark punch. A RPM is caused by a misalignment of separate punchings. The differences? Well, first consider why the mintmark punch gets damaged? The were adding the mintmark with hardened punch, in to a hardened die. After this happens over and over many times, the punch is going to suffer. The dies have the advantage. They are stronger, and only punched once. The punch is slowly altered, affected by the resistance of the stronger dies. On the 1982-D cent/other denominations, we see many mintmarks showing this exact damaged punch issue. So these are not RPMs, but from a damaged punch issue.
1982-Nickel-RPM-Appears-As-A-D-And-S-Upper-Left
The mintmarks are not showing spread, but just distortion. A RPM is created by miss alignment of several punch locations, thus showing spread. Two different issues. We see, the spread an note the enlargement of the mintmark. On a damaged punch issue, the mintmark is normal, not showing spread, but disfigurement from the damaged punch issue.
1982-Nickel-RPM-Appears-As-A-D-And-S-Upper-Left
Why is this information important? Because many dies will show the same disfiguring, on several different locations of the dies.
1982-Nickel-RPM-Appears-As-A-D-And-S-Upper-Left
So it is continually the same damage repeated over and over. So they are not RPMs, but a punch that needs to be retired.

How do collectors get the sense that something is not correct? When you see it over and over, and then it clicks, that is a damaged punch issue. On a roll of new coins I looked at years ago, the whole roll were what I though was RPMs. But there were different locations on the mintmark locations. Then I figured out, it was a damaged punch issue, and not a RPM issue on the dies. Because the mintmark punch was damaged.
1982-Nickel-RPM-Appears-As-A-D-And-S-Upper-Left
Sometimes, when we see a damaged mintmark punch issue, we wonder, why did they attribute a mintmark punch issue, but there were a RPM that was formed with the damaged mintmark punch, but is a RPM on a different area of the die:
1982-Nickel-RPM-Appears-As-A-D-And-S-Upper-Left
Note the same mintmark punch damage on each RPM. But the way it was punched, created a RPM. So sometimes it takes a discerning eye, to determine which is which. Hope this helps.

CoopHome : What is mintmark punch damage?
Edited by coop
04/08/2021 09:54 am
Valued Member
Chip chatters's Avatar
184 Posts
 Posted 04/08/2021  09:03 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Chip chatters to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
1s the 1949 d over S a worn die, And other nickels?
Valued Member
NickG's Avatar
United States
71 Posts
 Posted 04/09/2021  1:58 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add NickG to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hello Chip

Try checking http://www.varietyvista.com/index.htm for the RPM info. There is a lot of useful info on the site.
Bedrock of the Community
merclover's Avatar
United States
10635 Posts
 Posted 04/10/2021  03:59 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add merclover to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
"A nickel ain't worth a dime anymore." Yogi Berra
  Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 2,365Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.27 seconds to rattle this change. Forums