196x Cent Struck On Split Planchet 1.8g Need Confirmation

196x could happened a full split of the planchet. Joke: "The cent train for the silhouette".

Congrat., very rare coins like this. I hope you are happy with your discovery. VERRY, VERRY RARE.

100% split planchet.

Thanks everyone, yes there are similarities between this and the other one,this one with a little stronger strike on reverse and a bit heavier at 1.8g. Seller's pics didn't quite demonstrate the true nature of the errors but I had a hunch what they might be , so I took a chance and sure glad I did, they're pretty neat.

I'm in the post strike lamination peel on the reverse devices, but a pre strike planchet split before the strike. Thus the weakness of the memorial, because it peeled later, on some areas. So I feel it is a before split and after lamination peel.

Quite a spectacular coin!

I'm with you on the pre-strike split, but could you please explain how a lamination peel factors in? It looks to me like a straight-up split planchet that wasn't struck up where there wasn't enough pressure (i.e. behind the obverse devices where more metal is required to fill the die).
Just trying to understand what happened.

The split planchet is caused on the cold rolling of the stock material. Imagine you are making noodles and a piece of the dough gets separated, and you later roll it back into the dough. If there was added flour on the piece being re-attached to the dough, it will not stick to the lump. Well on cold roll metal, the same thing happens, it is rolled in to the metal, but because it was not hot, it doesn't attach to the roll that was hot rolled. So this piece will be long because it was rolled on the metal. But when the roll is but with the blanking process, the lamination/adhered in cold metal, will be flat, but will not stay attached to the hot rolled steel. So during the blanking/upset process to turn it into a planchet, the metal breaks away. After the strike some of the lamination falls away and those blank areas on we are seeing had the metal fall off after the strike. Thus the bald areas on the reverse. That is what I feel happened to this coin. Split pre-strike and the missing lamination happen after the strike. I can't think of any other way these areas would be bald looking?