| Author |
 Replies: 23 / Views: 2,095 |
|
Valued Member
United States
192 Posts |
Hey CC, Check out this 1955 D. Is this an RPM? I think it is? Your thoughts? Also, I see something weird on the reverse. It seems to have some Cud on wrapped around the "N" on ONE.     |
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
No RPM and no Cuds. Die chip on date. John1  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3281 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Edited by coop
06/26/2021 6:51 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
192 Posts |
@john1 are you high? Or are you just hating on me? Lol
|
|
Moderator
United States
56855 Posts |
I call em,like I see em  .Sorry. John1 |
|
Valued Member
United States
192 Posts |
@John1 I hear you. I am not taking it personal but this is an RPM tho. |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1998 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
176 Posts |
good call on the die clash, lawest.  |
|
Valued Member
United States
192 Posts |
Thanks to everyone for providing their input and links. I am still learning all the ins and outs of the hobby, but it's nice to have a place like this to share and care.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
Seems you didn't like our call on your coin, so why ask us? No RPM, sorry.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Just a die chip on the date as noted, and not an RPM.  |
|
Moderator
United States
56855 Posts |
coop said it is a RPM sooo? John1 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7174 Posts |
You people need to start reading posts before responding. Coop nailed the 1mm10. And it would have to have been a strong clash to involve the devices. Maybe a gouge?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
John1 just missed it because of the damage on the lower serif. If it were not for the damage, John1 would have spotted it as well. I just happened to look into the center of the mintmark and spotted it. Easy to do, when the damage ifs so strong.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
Cujohn makes a good point about people needing to read posts more carefully and look more closely at the images. It's easy to be right 99% of the time by simply saying "no, MD" in every thread, but the false negative rate is often higher than it should be.
Also, are you a fly fisher, Cujohn? Cujohn = copper john?
|
| |
Replies: 23 / Views: 2,095 |
Posted 06/26/2021 3:39 pm
