1793 Wreath 1c Vines And Bars Edge, Weight?'s

No really? It's impossible that this is real. So if you're out to prove that it's real I hope you're on extremely good terms with the big man upstairs since it would take an act of god himself to make this genuine.




If I'm reading this right, you don't think it can be a copy since there isn't one exactly like it. Could that perhaps be because it's an extremely poor quality one?




Wait. You think this is a specimen cent?

Alright, do me a favor then. Make sure to send this under the rarities tier, since if it was it'd be worth well in excess of 6 figures. I figure, oh, let's say a million which would likely be low. The grading fees should come out to be around $10,500. Please report back on your success.

Well, I gonna go out on a limb and say that Israel is out of our jurisdiction on requirements? If they did that here they'd be knocking on your door.

This OP posted the same story and pictures on the NGC site on June 10th and after about three pages of rambling,
I think he wore out his welcome. Now he is trying his nonsense on the CCF.
Just hope he doesn't post his 1976D Quarter, that was another three pager.

Proving the IMPROBABLE is one thing, there can be a lot to gain from this.
Proving the IMPOSSIBLE.. well, it's called this for a reason. It's a waste of time and resources.

Poorly done fake/counterfeit. Possibly a poor copy of a Ken Potter copy? .

I like everyone's answers, this is a perfect example of getting more than one experts opinions, hints the posting on NGC.
Again all I'm just showing what I found, no need to lock anything.
You all are saying it's the worst, yeah with a die break on one of the leafs, also I can't find anything like it, yeah the worst lol, well I mean think about it was so bad it broke the die.
Thanks all
Retained Interior Die Break. It's when a piece of the die breaks off but then settles back into the die.,,,, is what I meant to say, thanks to the one who explained RIDB :)

Yes sir 52Raymo, that is the seller.

Super Smart you are :)

I know this whole thing is far fetched, just like all of my coins, well except my 1834 Half Dime which happens to be a LM3.

I'm just showing coins, well kinda on a mission :), but that doesn't mean anything, for I'm just simply showing and asking questions, oh well sometimes I might give my opinion, in no way shape or form does this mean I'm right & I'm probably wrong about a bunch of stuff, just simply my opinion.

I respect the knowledge you all have, I respect it even more knowing you all have earned it threw school and other methods of learning :) just my opinion.

I also just have questions, lol they might not follow the normal lines of questions, thou that's all it is, just a question.
Thanks again all :)
I was hoping to show you all what I thought might be a RIDB, without the replica stuff even thou I said it was bought as one.

Thanks all

Ejection marks would not be a good sign. The genuine coins were not struck in a close collar and should not have ejection marks.

I'm not saying you all are wrong was just curious.
Why did Breen say,

Ejection: Single Planchet

Any failure of the feeding mechanism to eject the newly struck coin completely from the coining chamber will produce a mint error. Except for double profiles, these are major errors, some grotesque, all prized.

Along with,

22. Die breakage: Includes chips, single cracks, multiple cracks, split dies, bisecting cracks, rim crumbling, and major rim breaks. Accidents, one and all, not errors, though often collected by mint error specialists. An early complete listing is included in Die States for the individual varieties. Also see the keys to the various dates, which normally list the more bizarre or extreme die breaks.

Just kinda crazy, thanks all, no need to carry on.