| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,654 |
|
|
New Member
United States
7 Posts |
Hello all, I was going through some old coins with my daughter and we found one that I'm not sure how much I paid for it but it looks really nice to my untrained eye. I compared to the PCGS photograding and don't want to get my hopes up too much. I'm looking for some feedback regarding the grade of the coin as best as you can do with a couple pics.   Thanks for your help and cheers!
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
7 Posts |
two more pics for reference.  
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
AU53 sounds good to me as well, possibly AU55
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19118 Posts |
I'd go with AU55. Nice example.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36575 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
7 Posts |
Thanks everyone for the replies. Sounds like AU53-55 is the consensus. Cheers!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
I'll concur with AU53, some luster intact, but clear evidence of circulation.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18640 Posts |
97(O) can be weak to average in strike. this one is leaning toward the weak side. maybe 25% luster remaining. eye appeal and surface preservation are average. I'm not seeing anything that would cause a details designation on the coin. the coin has seen circulation. I think it can make AU55
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
AU-53 sounds about right for this one.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3628 Posts |
First,  Add me to the AU-53 club. Nice looking coin for the grade.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1086 Posts |
 to the club! I would also agree with AU-53, a little to worn for a 55
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,654 |
|