| Author |
 Replies: 10 / Views: 1,352 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
129 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
if you're thinking this is the 1888/7 overdate, this is definitely not it. Date logo position relative to the bust point and the underlying denticles is wrong.  |
|
Valued Member
 United States
129 Posts |
Yeah but did you zoom in from the bottom up to the middle right you could see it looks like A7 now my eyes can just be seeing things and I know it's not the one that they have listed but just to me it looks like one
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
This is the correct position of the date relative to the bust tip and dentils for the overdate. It is the only known obverse. Yours does not match this, sorry.   |
|
Valued Member
United States
480 Posts |
Looks like a Snow-2. Blow up the bust at thebottom, there should be the serif of a 1 there at the pearl.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19126 Posts |
Given the photos posted, I'm with the frog on this one.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
I disagree with damaged. There is something for sure under that last 8 and it looks like a 1. Is it possible that a 1881 got restamped as an 1888? I'd send it in to a TPGS.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
129 Posts |
Thanks Carl it really does look like something under that last 8. Well hopefully we will find out.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
163 Posts |
congrats on your find I sold 1 at great collections last week EF details hole and still brought 1350 the points on the last 8 look good and the Cud looks correct so I would send it in |
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,352 |
|
Posted 09/20/2021 10:21 pm
