| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 1,896 |
|
Valued Member
United States
138 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
Maybe, but your photos are angle which do not reflect the real things.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
138 Posts |
The larger close pictures are from toe microscope
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
The microscope is good, but when we go to much show complete others things then we look in collecting coins. An 100x I suggest to be the maximum. On some devices is hard to know but is just try to find the best. Photos for coins it is not a simple job I recognize, not your fault on. You see very well but not us, I made same thing in the begin.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Please no photos of your scopes monitor screen please...thanks. Also not so many photos per thread. And I am kinda sure they would be called varieties not errors. John1  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
579 Posts |
 Yep. Need better pics. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
579 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19226 Posts |
While all this gets sorted out, I'm thinking Die Deterioration may be working its magic. |
|
Valued Member
United States
138 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
More photos of the same thing don't help. I am seeing a great deal of glare in your lighting. Try using a defused lighting source.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
522 Posts |
Digital microscope, not optical, yes? Also, you have the lighting above coin. I aske because bouncing of light from the inside part of the rim is causing a possible reflection of the devices caught by the digital rendition of a real world image. Thoughts?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
138 Posts |
I don't know why it's giving such low quality pictures. I tried inside and outside. I will try again when I get home and cross my fingers there will b more clear. I have not had this problem before
|
|
Valued Member
United States
138 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
138 Posts |
The batch before this I was told or just the same as the prior, yet I took them outside with no light except natural with no microscope. I darkened 2 levels in the edit to help c detail..These coins alone are extremely shiny being they're out of a uncirculated roll
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
I'll repeat what I already said... more of the same photos do not help! Your dime has a good deal of contact marks for being from an "uncirculated roll." Still too much glare. And please, no more screen shots as they are way tooo pixelated. |
|
Valued Member
United States
138 Posts |
I've tried taking pictures inside under no light inside, outside..and camera I guess is just not suitable for this unfortunately. What do you take your pictures with? I obviously will b moving on from this coin due to not having the equipment adequate for this discussion
|
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 1,896 |
Posted 01/18/2022 01:21 am
