| Author |
 Replies: 15 / Views: 1,130 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
306 Posts |
Older blue holder.what do you think!   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6383 Posts |
Looks mint state although I can't see the luster very well. If it doesn't make the cut it's AU-58. Otherwise, MS-63. Nice Morgan!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19134 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
I'm at MS63. An ANACS blue label may have it MS64. Quote:
what do you think I think it's an above average strike. 1891-o can be a real pancake... Edited by dave700x
01/21/2022 5:34 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
869 Posts |
Typical Orlean's weak strike, but nice toning and eye appeal, MS63
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5177 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll say ANACS graded it MS-64.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
306 Posts |
I thought the strike was actually very nice.I agree 1891O can be really bad
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2222 Posts |
MS 63 , not too many distracting marks, overall nice!  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3632 Posts |
Nice 1891-O. I agree, this is a really nice strike for the year.
IMHO, the contact marks on the cheek and under the arrows on the reverse make this MS-63. I'm not a huge fan of toning, but the even golden toning on this coin and the strike give it good eye appeal for the grade.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
old blue holders can also be a reholdered white holder
I think its a 62
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18649 Posts |
 that the strike is better than average. would be nice to see out the holder as it appears that all the luster is gone from the cheek and neck. tough call AU58 or MS63. I think its possible she's a slider |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1048 Posts |
Sorry, but I see a little wear. It's not a strike issue. AU-58. MS-63 example on left:   |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
I'll say 63 for this one but might sneak into a 64 holder.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
306 Posts |
ANACS said 63, I paid 62 money but think it is 63 with a shot at 64 level. Now for the real question, as a PCGS snob is this a crossover candidate or would I need to crack and resubmit?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18649 Posts |
assess the cheek area closely for broken luster. I agree the reverse is 64 but unless that luster is there it may come back the same.
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,130 |
|
Posted 01/21/2022 4:42 pm
