| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,224 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
257 Posts |
I tend to be overly conservative in these, my early attempts at grading, as proven again with the 1853 silver dollar in an earlier thread. Back on the horse for me (with apologies for the smallish pics). Image: 1876obv.jpg27.49 KB Image: 1876rev.jpg30.5 KB Thanks in advance for sharing your knowledge and wisdom.
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
Nice detail on this coin, I think it would grade AU-50.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: Nice detail on this coin, I think it would grade AU-50. Heh. I'm 5 points below you this time.  The reverse is strong; the obverse, less so. Grading Seated coinage is like throwing darts while blindfolded - you can become good at it, but it takes a lot of practice. I have very little.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
I was a little doubtful about the shield but the rest of the coin look above EF so I went with the higher grade this time.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1691 Posts |
Does anybody see poorly struck CC on the rev? close up pics would help! $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$? PS grade AU-50 
Edited by atlashealth 02/01/2009 11:28 am
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
257 Posts |
Perhaps I am getting a bit better at this grading thing than I was last week. I was thinking in terms of XF45. It is gratifying to share the same page with the experts, for once.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
Nice toning. AU50
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6387 Posts |
I agree with AU-50. LIBERTY is very strong and even an EF 20-cent piece will usually have obvious wear to those letters. The greenish color around some stars looks a bit like corrosion but given the colorful toning elsewhere on the coin I would bet it's actually just more tone. The stars are bluntly struck (not worn) so they don't show much detail. It looks like a very nice example of this scarce date.
Fmtaxguy, do you own this coin, or are you thinking of buying it?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
257 Posts |
Jaobler, I just purchased it for $477, including shipping and insurance. I am a sucker for nice toning (in addition to incidentally collecting the twenty-cent pieces). I think the price is reasonable even if not a steal. Agree or disagree?
Atlashealth, if, when this coin arrives, and there is a CC marking, then the next round is on me.
Edited by fmtaxguy 02/01/2009 1:23 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1984 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
257 Posts |
halfabustisbetter, for educational purposes, could you tell me what you are looking at to conclude the coin was cleaned? I don't see it. But, then again, I am still learning how and at what to look. Does it appear harsh or mild? Any feedback would be most appreciated. Thanks.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1984 Posts |
I see hairlines, and patchy toning indicative of a cleaning. I can't tell from the lighting of the picture whether what I am seeing is accurate, it will help when you have it in hand. Cleaned or not I think you did pretty well.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
257 Posts |
halfabustisbetter, thanks so much for your direction and your encouragement.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
615 Posts |
I was thinking like EF40-45, but maybe I am to harsh on this one.
-SWUSC
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
257 Posts |
The coin arrived today and looks just as sharp in hand as magnified and photographed. The toning is nearing rainbow colors in some areas. I'm a sucker for toning. There is no corrosion apparent on the coin. And to atlashealth: Sorry, there is no surprise CC mint mark on the coin. I've emailed you with a bit more detail on that.
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,224 |
|