| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,037 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
808 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Sure looks MS to me - maybe 63/64.  to the CCF!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19146 Posts |
Classic '64 D from worn dies--nice and near fresh. MS64 perhaps. First photos make it appear the coin may be plated. Additional pics suggest not.
May have spent a good while in someone's sock drawer.
Edited by ijn1944 04/22/2022 7:55 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
That's a great roll find,2x2 worthy. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
878 Posts |
Beautiful nickel! Worth protecting for sure.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Impaired proof or plated coin . Otherwise would have been an MS-67+ if not have been found circulating . 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
tough to grade from piecemeal photos, maybe MS-63, I'm not a fan of the orange peel effect from worn dies
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Quote: Impaired proof No 1964-D proofs made that year. John1 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Quote: No 1964-D proofs made that year. John1 I know John , I was just testing you . 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
808 Posts |
The shine on the obverse is what attracted me. I have a lot of 1964 nickels! None look like this one.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
808 Posts |
Only has 4 visible steps! It is in a flip though.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15409 Posts |
Late die state but a very nice example a very common date, especially from current CRH.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,037 |
|