| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 849 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
128 Posts |
   *** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19154 Posts |
If possible, please remove the coin from the plastic holder and re-photograph. In some of the pics, the coin appears (appears...) to be a proof.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
128 Posts |
I think it has a proof finsh
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree, pics without the holder would help.  to the CCF!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
128 Posts |
Im going to say number 1.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Please type out the attribution number,thanks. John1 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
128 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Yours does not look like that one. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Mintmark location would help us to determine what die number it is. Without that, it makes it a lot harder. (Better images would be helpful) Wexler has some other listings: http://doubleddie.com/823839.html
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Ray3535, Best to take and post photos the exact way they are on the reference sites. John1 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
128 Posts |
Ok I think it's the 1972s 1do -002. And I don't have any more capsule sorry about the images.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
128 Posts |
And the coin is so brilliant that it's really hard to get good pics
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Your coin looks like a proof,so it can't be 1DO-002 John1 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
128 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
With these pictures I'm not seeing any doubling.
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 849 |
|