| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,305 |
|
|
New Member
United States
18 Posts |
Edited by j00s 05/03/2022 7:16 pm
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Looks like a deliberate puncture attempt.  to the CCF!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1489 Posts |
I'm trying to imagine a long-ago scenario where a gum ball machine caused the damage. Regardless, it is post-mint damage of some type.
|
|
New Member
 United States
18 Posts |
Have you guys ever seen these type of damage?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21606 Posts |
It is damage and certainly not worth grading. And yes, I have seen that type of damage.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15422 Posts |
Damaged coins indeed. No need to waste your $ for grading fees.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34408 Posts |
I wonder if that dime wasn't turned into a cuff link or button at one point.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
That is what I was thinking, nevertheless, PMD. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Really not worth saving either
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19150 Posts |
Appears to be mechanical vending machine damage to me. Keep 'em if you like 'em.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
IMO, two different types of damage on the 5c and 10c. I'm with Spence on the dime, looks like heat damage on the reverse from where the metal flowed when melted. Remnants in the center from how it was mounted, either a pin or cuff link. Nickel is PMD, circular mechanical cuts into the surface
|
|
New Member
 United States
18 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
162 Posts |
 poor coins. But no matter how damaged it is, it's always worth silver content!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3328 Posts |
 damage is damage, it's definitely from machine, I see it fairly often on Canadian smaller coins from the 60s-80s, I always assumed it was just coin roller damage from what ever they used at that time. Newer coinage the roller damage is always closer to the rim.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,305 |
|