| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,839 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
102 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
I do not think it is an RPM. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Edited by coop 05/24/2022 10:18 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96209 Posts |
not sure what happened to the MM but not an RPM though.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
102 Posts |
|
|
New Member
United States
2 Posts |
hwbfresh, I found some information I believe will help answer your questions at https://board.conecaonline.org/foru...1-1974-s-rpmTurns out, the San Francisco mint actually punched the 'S' mint Mark of both proof and business strike coins using a broken mint mark punch that had been originally been made/used 32 years earlier on 1940s-1950s San Francisco minted coins. In 1974 when the punch that was being used broke, they must not have had time to make a new one I guess, because they ended up using the old degraded punch they had on hand to punch the 'S' onto multiple denominations minted in San Francisco in 1974. Hope this helps. & 
|
|
New Member
United States
2 Posts |
Dr. Wiles who first cataloged the MMS varieties has confirmed that what he originally noted as the MMS-004, and the MMS-009 are indeed punched using the exact same mint mark punch, over 30 years apart. The only difference is on the 1974s the split serif appears due to further and continued degradation of the punch itself, but Dr. Wiles has confirmed the finding and agreed to update his listings.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8751 Posts |
-makecents-
Edited by -makecents- 07/28/2022 07:51 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188560 Posts |
 to the Community, GoonieGirl80!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3402 Posts |
Welcome to the CCF...keep on truckin (coin hunting)!!!
KK
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,839 |
|