| Author |
 Replies: 15 / Views: 2,098 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
80 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21589 Posts |
Sorry but not seeing it.
There should be a little nub of the 7 sticking out of the bottom left of the 8.
Perhaps someone else can give an opinion.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
54280 Posts |
Show your financial support of the Coin Community Family (click here)See my topic on Mexican Numismatic Medals (click here) |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5079 Posts |
Sorry, no evidence of any of the big 3 diagnostics.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3468 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
80 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
This one can be dismissed easily by comparing the position of the date logo to the dentils and bust tip. The OP's example (sorry, not AU) shows a numeral 1 too far to the left of a genuine example.  Edited by Coinfrog
06/05/2022 6:43 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21589 Posts |
More pictures won't change the fact that it is not an 1888/7.
Look at the picture that nss-52 supplied, you are missing both markers.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2281 Posts |
This is not it
You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Coffin nailed, sorry.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1018 Posts |
Definitely not the 1888/7, and really a VF example overall. How did you come up with AU?
|
|
Valued Member
Indonesia
147 Posts |
Dear Josha113n757, Although I believe there was 7 before, but the strike it's not strong enough. Perhaps the quality of the picture too blurry, so I can't see what you've imaging. From your first image, it's look like the top of 7 at the top of middle 8, But once again, it could be some mark cause by many factors. Also the mark look like the base of 1 between 1 and 8. Here's two image maybe can representing what you trying to say:   Because I my self found a lot of mark on Indian head series, mostly on the date. But ussually weak mark. But the point is the mark must strong enough. If so, this art will not exciting and challenging anymore. Solo |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
As noted, the alignment between the date logo and the rim dentils confirms that this is not the overdate.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Thanks, expert, but we're talking about the 1888/7 overdate here.
|
|
Valued Member
Indonesia
147 Posts |
@Coinfrog and all, my apologize if my comment are out of topics.
I'll deleted it then.
Thank you for remind me.
Solo
|
|
Moderator
United States
95064 Posts |
Well it seems like I'm late to this party, I'll agree with the others that this is not an over date given the examples provided to prove otherwise.
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 2,098 |
|
Posted 06/05/2022 6:09 pm
