Inside the lower loop of the mintmark, you can see mintmark punch damage from the punch used many times on a hardened die. This distorts the punch:
Machine Doubling alters the devices on the coin. The date and the mintmark should not be showing the same direction of push by
Machine Doubling. If that is seen on the coin, it is not a doubled die or a RPM. It is
Machine Doubling. How can I prove that?

Note this is a DDO-001 1969-S Cent. Note the yellow arrows. The arrows are pointing to
Machine Doubling. we see
Machine Doubling on this doubled die, but note the doubling is not seen on the mintmark? But
Machine Doubling is seen on both. Why should this not look this way? The die creation is one step. If a doubled die is created on the die, by the hub, it is a doubled die. The mintmark is added in a different step. So seeing
Machine Doubling both date and mintmark, this is not a RPM. But
Machine Doubling. So the die was created with a hub doubling issue. Thus the term "doubled die". So when the date is normal and the mintmark is normal and showing
Machine Doubling, it is not a variety, but a case of
Machine Doubling on the coin. You could have both a RPM and a
DDO, but the chances of the spread direction being the same would be extremely rare. (None that I know of)
So when you see both areas affected the same, it is
Machine Doubling on those areas.
CoopHome:
What does it mean, if you see what look like doubling on both the date and the mintmark? ( Machine Doubling)