| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,192 |
|
|
New Member
United States
21 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll say AU-55.  to the CCF!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2001 Posts |
I'm with Frog, AU-55. Nice coin.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
if the color is accurately depicted, to me it looks cleaned, so AU details
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
797 Posts |
I agree, looks cleaned. AU-55.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Low AU cleaned. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1173 Posts |
AU-55, looks cleaned to me.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18630 Posts |
AU53. the reverse looks quite dull for an AU coin and the surfaces just dont look original so I'm 75% leaning towards a cleaned coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19113 Posts |
I'm thinking strong AU55. Shows a cleaning at some point in the past.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3402 Posts |
I'm with AU-55...does look kinda dull overall...like it was cleaned.
KK
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36519 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187654 Posts |
A nice example. I concur with the consensus.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19931 Posts |
AU-55, probably lightly cleaned and retoned as some point.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4085 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
21 Posts |
Thanks guys, I thought it was cleaned myself, has that dull shine to it! Appreciate all the info.
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,192 |
|