| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 740 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
Hopefully the pics are ok. This coin is certainly Prooflike to me. To me I also believe it is Uncirculated . My personal thought is it would grade MS-62     Edited by JasonKflo
08/14/2022 12:58 am
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
398 Posts |
I'm at ms60. Awesome coin.
|
|
Valued Member
Germany
312 Posts |
Looks really good. I would say MS-62.
Edited by HP2001PH
08/14/2022 02:26 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
Tons of marks. No higher than MS61 for me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2334 Posts |
Frosty...
I don't know if there is enough on all the devises to carry a PL...but she's pretty darn close.
MS-62PL
smat
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18663 Posts |
based on the photos provided
luster is dull across all devices and fields for an MS coin
strike is a tad weak for the year
surface preservation shows staining at K4-K6 obv. there is a clear delineation line from K8-K4 obv and the same on the reverse indicating a possible old dip. light marks/scratches on both devices and fields on both sides.
eye appeal less than average
I'm at AU55 or MS62. based on the obv I'm leaning toward AU55
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1694 Posts |
@panzaldi I do not think I did this one justice.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1298 Posts |
Photos indicate possible MS. Probably not PL.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18663 Posts |
Quote:
@panzaldi I do not think I did this one justice. so are you saying the first obv photo is not really accurate as to what it looks like in Hand? if thats the case then how can we grade it with any accuracy at all? how does the luster look in hand on the obv? i still have a problem with the delineation on both sides essentially pointing to a dip of the coin to that level. I cant explain how that could happen on both sides equally. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36744 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
I do not think I captured the mirror on either side.
I do not see a dipped coin . Possibly in Acetone but surfaces are original.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
484 Posts |
Quite a reach for MS. The luster is broken on the cheek and just does not come thru. Looks to be rub on the high points. It is kinda PL, though. Dipped AU-58.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
it does not really look rubbed in hand on the cheek though that is the spot I could see it making it AU-58
Does not look like wear angling it over white which usually makes rub stand out.
Coin was quick dipped in Acetone to make sure there was no residue .
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 740 |
|
Posted 08/13/2022 10:10 pm
