| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 1,606 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
This one has A semi prooflike reverse with lots of Die Polishing Lines . My thought is its AU-58 but very near Unc Again reverse has heavy die polishing Upon review looks like VAM 15 to me     Edited by JasonKflo
08/13/2022 11:51 pm
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
398 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34408 Posts |
@jas, it is a small thing, but moving forward, please include all four digits in the date of the title of your threads. Having a complete date improves the search ability of your thread. I'll fix this last batch for you no problem. Thx.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2281 Posts |
It's unorthodox to give your thoughts and opinions first when asking others for theirs. It will skew things, and TPG companies do not do this. You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
Edited by NumismaticsFTW
08/14/2022 01:13 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2334 Posts |
Quote:
It's unorthodox to give your thoughts and opinions first when asking others for theirs. idk...? I often include my opinion when posting a grade request...think it helps me project to others if I'm in the ball park or way off... I agree... Really close to Unc (the reverse carries her) but a solid AU-58. VAM-15  smat |
|
Valued Member
United States
66 Posts |
Looks like it has been cleaned to me.
|
|
Valued Member
Germany
312 Posts |
Maybe its just the pictures but the luster seems to be broken on large parts of the coin. I am saying AU-55.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1694 Posts |
 Sorry did not think of this . I generally like to do this so you all know my thoughts up front so when the coin comes back from grading I know how close I was without being influenced either. |
|
Valued Member
Germany
312 Posts |
If the coin is yet ungraded (professionally) I do not see the difference between the grade opinion that is voiced in the original post vs. all the other grade opinions.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1298 Posts |
Hard to make an accurate judgement with the photos.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18663 Posts |
i agree with your comment regarding PL reverse. I dont think the obv would make the designation. a tad weak for the year. broken luster both sides. surface preservation imo puts it around AU55. I think its short of 58 as the obv surfaces are not clean enough to warrant the grade
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1511 Posts |
I am at AU-55 as well on this one
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36744 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
The reverse hairline looking marks are die polishing marks on this one.
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,606 |
Posted 08/14/2022 12:35 am
