| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,655 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
157 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97089 Posts |
Sure looks like it. Lets see what others have to say. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1998 Posts |
Appears to be MD. Wexler's WDDO-008 is a proof coin, yours appears to be business strike
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
157 Posts |
Where do I find this information as it isn't online? Thank you in advance
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
@Lawest considering this is a Denver minted coin, I highly doubt wexler has DDO-008 listed as a proof...
Edited by SamCoin 10/04/2022 01:11 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
008 is not a proof. I wonder when he included this as a DD. I always thought it was channeling.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
509 Posts |
Let's keep in mind that Wexler's site lists DDO-008 as a Small Date. The author's coin appears to be a large date. It's a shame that Doubleddie. com does not also show the mint mark position for this supposed variety. I too am of the opinion that the site's listing appears to be more a form of a specific type of Strike Doubling than that of a doubled die.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
It is hard to say if is 008. Some differences I see and no the markers from Wexler I will include here your photos worked a little bit. I do 'it to see for markers. I see something with the MM, is doubling? no Idea, they are 164 for this year. PS: If you click on my photos you can see well magnify.  
Edited by silviosi 10/04/2022 02:40 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
509 Posts |
Hello Silvio's, long time no talk, hope you are well. Quote: It is hard to say if is 008. According to Wexler's attribution, as I mentioned directly above your comment, this cannot be DDO-008 due to Wexler's example clearly stating his doubled die is a Small Date. The author's coin is a Large Date.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
Hi Bumpkin, I am well, busy but I drive.
I do not say it is 008, and thanks to mention me this about date. I was just thinking of the photos and the differences of the bust design the I work the photos to see clear all the coin and get to see the RPM's for this year and then I just give-up, never pass all the 164 posted on VV. Sorry my mistake not to read attentive.
But it is interesting coin and very similar with WDDO-008
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
157 Posts |
Great job on the photos. Small date and large date are very similar on this date. My eyes are tricking me. Could it be a small date over large date?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1998 Posts |
Sorry about the inaccurate comment, I looked at the wrong listing on Wexler's site
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
157 Posts |
Mint Mark close up. This looks like an opm or rpm not sure which of the 2. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2558 Posts |
It looks like MD all the way around to me. Date, MM and Lincoln.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,655 |
|