Do you not find it odd, that the "brockage" design elements line up perfectly with what the design would be on a normally struck coin?
Secondly, the 'brockage' rim thickness is twice as large, but the denticles are not enlarged.
Lastly, the depth of the indent is very shallow; much less than any strike-through clip element I have seen on 1-cent coins.
As much as I respect Mike's research and work, I don't find his interpretation plausible with this coin.
You would have an easier time convincing me it was double struck, with the second strike through an overlapping thin planchet, or a die cap fragment.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy
eBay store