Quote:
Actually the part in the middle is obviously epoxy of some type but I put the microscope all the way down to get a really close view and it's definitely copper around the edges.
I think Occam's razor applies here.
There are two postulated hypotheses to describe this coin:
1. The coin has glue, varnish or some similar foreign substance attached to it, and this is what is causing the odd lumps in the middle, and the odd lumps at the rims.
2. The coin is some kind of super-disintegrated die error with lots of gigantic rim
Cuds, where lots of "extra copper" has been added to the rim yet somehow manages to still preserve some of the details underneath the "
Cuds" (such as the L in LIBERTY), and then many years later, the coin was epoxy-glued onto a surface via a blog of glue only in the centre of the coin, on the same side as the weird mint error occurred, in such a way that it kind of looks like "epoxy" is the cause of both defects, but it really isn't.
Occam's Razor says that the "simplest" explanation is the one that's most likely to be true. And clearly, explanation 1 is the "simplest".
Whenever you see any kind of "error coin" or "damaged coin", Occam's Razor says that it's best to assume just a single event has caused all of the apparent damage. Because in 99.995% of cases, it is indeed all caused by a single event. Most coins don't have awesome mint errors on them, and most coins don't get epoxied onto something so that the glue sticks to it. Both events are rather improbable. Having multiple highly improbable coin-damaging events all happen to the same coin is extra-improbable.
I can assure you, that whatever the glop attached to this coin is, that it has caused both the lumps in the middle, and the lumps around the rims.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis