| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,475 |
|
|
New Member
United States
5 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97894 Posts |
 Very much a damaged coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
  to the CCF!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19225 Posts |
Yes, post-strike damage. Not a strikethrough.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
 to the CCF One of the first things to remember is, that if you have a coin with a gouge and a pile up of metal, 99% of the time it's damage. A strike through would be incused and the edges would be the same level as the field or the devices.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
Looks as if someone tried to cut into it. Most likely intentional post mint damage.   to the CCF !
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
The question it is why I have clad in the like hit part and the side of the coin is strange. Here a close photo of the side.  This coin need a close look on and analyze.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
Silviosi, no need for a closer look or analyzing. All this is is damage. The nickel layer was just smeared into the copper layer.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
@CU, I understand you but me I do not explain now the raise marks and the crack on the core cooper.  1965 strike was full of recycle and so more due to the increase in the production and to be done was also move to next year.
|
|
New Member
 United States
5 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21643 Posts |
Still PMDIt doesn't matter how it happened, all that matters is that it could not happen during the striking of the coin so it has to be damage.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,475 |
|