1964 Jefferson Nickel DDO-013

Very nice find, Sam! Very nice separation.

Great closeup shots!

@Ijn and Dearborn not DDD. You can see the clear separation lines on the N, W, and E as well. Also note the splitting on the tail of the R, which is completely impossible from MD or DDD. Check against DDO-013. I'm very confident in my attribution (here's the link, which you can always look up yourself, since I gave the attribution number)

http://www.varietyvista.com/04b%20J...4PDDO013.htm

@Dearborn Not trying to start a fight, but I did absolutely state the site implicitly. DDO refers to Variety Vista, WDDO refers to Wexler's listings. I just find it a little worrying when people here incorrectly dismiss a correctly attributed variety out of hand without looking it up, because, while I know what I'm doing, there are lots of new users who don't, and I've seen actual varieties be rejected here by people who fall into a lazy habit of automatically rejecting everything out of hand. The problem is, most posts here are not in fact varieties, so answering MD/DDD will be correct at least 95% of the time. However, if your false negative rate is high on those remaining 5% of posts that are varieties, then your 0% false positive rate on the 95% that were not varieties is much less useful to the community. Anyway, rant over, but this is really the one big concern I've had for quite a while as a part of this community.

@Dearborn All good, sorry if I was a little grouchy in my responses. There was really no need for me to be snarky about posting the link, and I should have kept MY mouth shut in the first place, since it really only took a second. I apologize for being a bit of a jerk :)

Every member new or not needs to post the attribution number they think it might be each and every time. Always check all three main reference sites before posting here.If a new member does not know the three sites that's different, posting here first is fine we can post links for them.
John1

@John Not sure I follow your comment, but I posted the VV reference number in the title. If you're making reference to the exchange between me and Dearborn, I think you're misunderstanding what happened. Dearborn was asking for the link, but the reference number was always in the title.

@ijn Ah, no problem, gotcha. This one actually seems to be on the earlier side of the die's lifetime as it shows much more split serifs than the stage B on variety vista, but I do see the start of some DDD at the top of the S in TRUST for sure.