Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsJoin Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Found A 1978 LMC With A Different Looking Reverse Design. Seems Closer To A Reverse Of A 1978-S?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 30 / Views: 1,691Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
-makecents-'s Avatar
United States
8751 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2023  9:45 pm  Show Profile   Check -makecents-'s eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add -makecents- to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
The thinner letters example was caused by die abrasion.
I did an overlay of your example photos. The thinner version over a thicker. One photo is an exact overlay and the other is with the photos offset.
As you can see there is no spacing difference, only a difference of thickness cause by die abrasion.
John, (yes, another John), I'll start by saying that you taught me as much as anyone else has, a few years ago, on another site, but would have to disagree with the spacing. It would be impossible to "thin" the letters, without creating more space between them. The coin size did not change, the location of the centers of the letters did not change, only the total size of each letter. This being said, the spacing between them, would have to be greater, on the abraded letters.
-makecents-
Pillar of the Community
stoneman227's Avatar
United States
2376 Posts
 Posted 05/23/2023  06:29 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add stoneman227 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
John, (yes, another John), I'll start by saying that you taught me as much as anyone else has, a few years ago, on another site, but would have to disagree with the spacing. It would be impossible to "thin" the letters, without creating more space between them. The coin size did not change, the location of the centers of the letters did not change, only the total size of each letter. This being said, the spacing between them, would have to be greater, on the abraded letters.

Hmmm
You make a darned good point. I think that I have done too much layout work for stone and marble in my life and casually used the word spacing without reference. You are absolutely correct that there is more space between the letters,but that is actually the outside edges of the letters. I should have made it clear that the position of each letter in the design , has not changed . In my work I so often use center lines to determine coursing of stone so in this case the spacing of the centers of the letters did not change.
Sorta like the Wide and Close AM's . The position/coursing/spacing of the centerlines of the A and M of a Close AM don't change with abrasion , only the perceived space between them.
Many thanks for pointing this out !
Edited by stoneman227
05/23/2023 06:32 am
Bedrock of the Community
sel_69l's Avatar
Australia
21788 Posts
 Posted 05/23/2023  07:34 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add sel_69l to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Different master dies of the same general design?
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
-makecents-'s Avatar
United States
8751 Posts
 Posted 05/23/2023  07:47 am  Show Profile   Check -makecents-'s eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add -makecents- to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the reply, stoneman!
-makecents-
New Member
AF1996's Avatar
United States
30 Posts
 Posted 05/23/2023  6:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add AF1996 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi, thanks for everyone's help! I had some questions on over polished dies and I'd like to try to see if there is anything else to look for to confirm this is reason the reverse on this coin appears this way. I've also included some additional pictures taking a look at the field area that surrounds the devices and the height of the devices.

1. The first 2 images show the E and R in America. There is a noticeable gap between the top of the E and R. This larger gap appears common on the 1978 Proof reverse. Also, when looking at the field area surrounding E and R and the overall height they look normal to me. I do realize it has a tapered look to it but I'm not sure that's from over polishing.
2. I also included an image of U N I that also seems to be of similar height from the surrounding field area. I assume that if a person was using a tool to polish the die it would create devices that maybe are uneven in height?
3. Is the anything else to look for that would help to confirm over polishing changed the appearance of this coin.

I also included an image of a proof reverse from PCGS.com. Note the size of the font and the gap between the top of the E and R.

Thanks for everyone's help! I'm new to error coins and still learning. The reverse on this coin seemed very different when compared to other late 70's coins. The spacing and gap between the E and R seem very similar to the 1978 proof coin. I do understand that over polishing can make devices thinner, but when looking more closely the height and appearance seems pretty consistent throughout the coin.

Another observation with the reverse of this coin is the size of Unites States of America. While it seems thinner the size appears larger then regular strike coins.

Thanks again!


Found-A-1978-LMC-With-A-Different-Looking-Reverse-Design.-Seems-Closer-To-A-Reverse-Of-A-1978-S?
Found-A-1978-LMC-With-A-Different-Looking-Reverse-Design.-Seems-Closer-To-A-Reverse-Of-A-1978-S?
Found-A-1978-LMC-With-A-Different-Looking-Reverse-Design.-Seems-Closer-To-A-Reverse-Of-A-1978-S?
Found-A-1978-LMC-With-A-Different-Looking-Reverse-Design.-Seems-Closer-To-A-Reverse-Of-A-1978-S?
Found-A-1978-LMC-With-A-Different-Looking-Reverse-Design.-Seems-Closer-To-A-Reverse-Of-A-1978-S?
Found-A-1978-LMC-With-A-Different-Looking-Reverse-Design.-Seems-Closer-To-A-Reverse-Of-A-1978-S?
Found-A-1978-LMC-With-A-Different-Looking-Reverse-Design.-Seems-Closer-To-A-Reverse-Of-A-1978-S?
Edited by AF1996
05/23/2023 6:06 pm
Pillar of the Community
stoneman227's Avatar
United States
2376 Posts
 Posted 05/23/2023  9:00 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add stoneman227 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
All 1978 Memorial reverses are the same design, business and proof strikes , RDV-004 . The same reverse design was used for all cents from 1974 to 1985.
http://varietyvista.com/09d%20WQ%20...arieties.htm
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
96215 Posts
 Posted 05/23/2023  9:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dearborn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Different master dies of the same general design?

This is what I was originally thinking, but, Yeah, I got it now Jon, I wasn't thinking centerline to centerline (which I should have as I do that all the time at work - You see when I hang network cabinets on a TMB (Telephone Mounting Board) I have to measure the mounting holes, but I measure in this case edge to edge - which is the same as center to center.)
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
96215 Posts
 Posted 05/23/2023  9:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dearborn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Has anyone ever tried to mount on a wall a power strip that has the mounting holes only on the back? Trying to get 2 blind holes to line up with 2 screws you put on the wall is difficult. So there are 2 ways to get the mounting screws in the exact correct location:
1. put the power strip on a scanner and make a copy of the back of the strip and use it as a template. or

2. if you have no access to a scanner, I measure the hole distance (edge to edge)
Edited by Dearborn
05/23/2023 9:12 pm
Pillar of the Community
stoneman227's Avatar
United States
2376 Posts
 Posted 05/23/2023  9:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add stoneman227 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
You could use a analog scanner to do it.
A piece of paper and a pencil. Just make a rubbing of the holes for the template!
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
96215 Posts
 Posted 05/23/2023  9:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dearborn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
huh, that could be #3, thanks, didn't think of a rubbing, but then the last time I used a pencil that way was 55 years ago..
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
-makecents-'s Avatar
United States
8751 Posts
 Posted 05/23/2023  10:25 pm  Show Profile   Check -makecents-'s eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add -makecents- to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Not joking, but there is a pencil behind my ear about 18 hours out of every day. Pencils are extremely handy for many things, but most importantly, mistakes. My reason....
-makecents-
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
96215 Posts
 Posted 05/23/2023  10:37 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dearborn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
for me, it is a pair of electrical snips, a pen, a small 'tweeker' screwdriver, and a sharpie on my belt
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
-makecents-'s Avatar
United States
8751 Posts
 Posted 05/23/2023  10:48 pm  Show Profile   Check -makecents-'s eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add -makecents- to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Do you occasionally whip out the sharpy like a gunslinger?
-makecents-
Valued Member
Canada
333 Posts
 Posted 05/24/2023  06:23 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jess1234 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
96215 Posts
  Previous TopicReplies: 30 / Views: 1,691Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.56 seconds to rattle this change. Forums