Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Belgium? Spanish Netherlands? Overstruck

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 572Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community

Australia
3831 Posts
 Posted 06/10/2023  12:05 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add gxseries to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I collect overstruck coin and this stumped me. I did some homework but would like second opinions. I believe is Spanish Netherlands Brabant 1713 (?) 1 liard overstruck over older 1 oord. Bent unfortunately... Any history behind this?

Belgium?-Spanish-Netherlands?-Overstruck

My partial coin collection http://www.omnicoin.com/collection/gxseries
My numismatics articles and collection: http://www.gxseries.com/numis/numis_index.htm
Regularly updated at least once a month.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
tdziemia's Avatar
United States
7934 Posts
 Posted 06/10/2023  10:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add tdziemia to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, at first glance that looks right. We can see the Austrian coat of arms around 7:00 on the obverse,from the earlier type of Philip V or Charles II (or even earlier).

It was a very turbulent time in Brabant, so this would not be surprising. In France and Lorraine, silver coins were being re-used as the coinage was frequently revalued in the 1710s. In this case, I would expect it had more to do with disruption of supply lines (or other disruptions) as the war was winding down.
Edited by tdziemia
06/10/2023 10:37 pm
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
tdziemia's Avatar
United States
7934 Posts
 Posted 06/12/2023  2:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add tdziemia to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
To complete the story ...

When the war of the Spanish Succession was settled, and Charles VI of Austria took possession of the Low Countries, the small change situation was a mess, so he promulgated a new copper coinage toward the end of 1711, which went into effect in 1712. All the old liards were declared obsolete, and could be turned in at the mint (Brussels and Antwerp) at a rate of 7 old ones for 6 new ones.

Each mint was authorized to strike 50,000 marks of new liards (about 3.1 million). The Brussels mintmaster prepared new blanks, but the Antwerp mintmaster struck them on the old liards, though this had been forbidden.
(A. de Witte, Histoire Monetaire des Comtes de Louvain, Ducs de Brabant, et Marquis du Saint Empire Romain, Vol III (1890), p.255-257).

Here are two others like yours:
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=7307185
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=3904547
Edited by tdziemia
06/12/2023 2:28 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 572Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.17 seconds to rattle this change. Forums