| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 1,767 |
|
Pillar of the Community
2222 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2835 Posts |
1865, I believe is what my old eyes are telling me.
Edited by coin rejector 09/06/2023 12:23 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Have you tried to take a black and white pic? Sometimes that helps. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I give. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6525 Posts |
I see an 88 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3468 Posts |
Looks like it could be 1888
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1657 Posts |
It's a type 2 so would be mid 1886 or after. 1888 gets my vote as well.
Edited by lcutler 09/06/2023 5:09 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8516 Posts |
It looks like the last feather is after the I in America.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73844 Posts |
It looks like it's 1888.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
878 Posts |
You could also try the old pencil/paper rub to see if you can get a little more date detail that way.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8516 Posts |
Pretty sure it's a type 1 so 1886 or before.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1657 Posts |
I think 52Raymo has better eyesight than me, squinting my eyes and twisting my head, I now agree, type 1. Maybe 1868.
Edited by lcutler 09/07/2023 04:23 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1018 Posts |
I see what looks to be a Shallow N reverse as well as a type 1 obverse. Would likely make it 1860s. Maybe a 1865 or 1868.
|
|
New Member
United States
35 Posts |
I vote 1868 from changing the tint back and forth.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 2222 Posts |
Thanks so much folks! I wish I could give you each a prize for helping me, but THANKS will have to do. I'm calling it - 1865. Acetone and a Q tip along with your remarks helped me come to this conclusion. Thanks again   
|
| |
Replies: 19 / Views: 1,767 |