| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 452 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1502 Posts |
Wasn't planning on conserving this ground find but interested in learning if what happened to date was Mint or PMD. Obviously the coin took a major hit post mint really close to the date. But the date is totally unrecognizable and I do not think the hit is responsible. I'm guessing it is some form of LAM but seems pretty extreme. It almost looks like the planchet wasn't well formed. Thoughts? I'm interested in learning about this one. I have it soaking now with hopes of making the area more visible.    Edited by DOCC 12/01/2023 5:30 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8750 Posts |
It would be good to get the coin cleaned up before we evaluate. What is going on the rest of the coin would help to know what may be happening with the area in question.
-makecents-
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
1502 Posts |
Makes sense makecents, I'll post better shots in a few hours.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74189 Posts |
Standing by. 
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
What are you soaking it in?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
For me seem to be 1944 S. The orientation of the S.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6505 Posts |
Just based on how flat and sharply different the columns are from the background, I am going to bet on sanded.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
1502 Posts |
Quote: What are you soaking it in? In Acetone now.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
1502 Posts |
BM, but the date?
It has cavities. As best as I can compare, think gold nugget. A LAM should be a failry consistent as far as I know. Hang tight, Acetone doing its work and coin is getting much clearer - I'll post updated shots in an hour.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
1502 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96071 Posts |
looks like a 1945 with a lam over the date. But you did a great job getting most of the gunk off this coin. I don't think there is any intentional damage to this coin, just a major scrape on the obverse and heavy circulation wear.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74189 Posts |
Nice Lamination. 
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
1502 Posts |
I was just about to call a mulligan Dearborn.
Given the depth of perceived LAM, how would the numbers of the date still be visible. I would imagine they would have lifted off with lost metal. LAM or issue with original planchet - I'll call it a mint error either way.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
One think is sure: this it ia not an Mint error. You can call how you want, but it is not an error. At 500 Si alloy, ground coin as per your declation, cracking and exfoliations ocur. Then the coin was sand out to heck. The date it is uncertanlly, so will not qualify for an P1. You like keep but you lost a space.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96071 Posts |
I think it was a pre strike lam, which would explain the date showing in the lam
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 452 |
|