| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 1,116 |
|
Valued Member
United States
134 Posts |
Hi All, Need some help identifying if these 2 Kennedy half dollars are TDO FS-101's or just damage. 2 decent examples and in decent shape. Not sure if these are worth getting graded but figured I would get some feedback from the community here! thanks again      *** Moved by Staff moved to a more appropriate forum. ****** Edited by Staff to clarify topic title. Please put as much info in the title as you can, they are very important. ***Edited by PaulyD 01/15/2024 10:27 am
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 The mint mark is PMD.Not worth slabbing. John1 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
134 Posts |
Thanks John1. PMD on both coins?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Last photo might be MD on the mint mark. John1 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
134 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74449 Posts |
I agree with John1.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4135 Posts |
No extra value on either coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6531 Posts |
I think you guys are looking at the wrong thing here. Doubled dies don't happen on hand punched mint marks. There appears to be slight doubling on the W in at least one picture there. Let's see a magnified picture of We Trust on both coins. 
Edited by Brandmeister 01/15/2024 3:38 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
134 Posts |
@Brandmeister...I'll try to get the photos you are asking for of both coins with "We Trust"
Thanks
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
134 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96581 Posts |
Are these images of one coin or 2? (I only ask because of the 2 MM images appear to be from 2 coins.)
As for the doubling, I may see some that Brand pointed out, but not too sure. most of the other images shoe circulation flattening and hits.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6531 Posts |
http://www.varietyvista.com/12%20Ke...201968-D.htm That is definitely interesting. The rest of Trust is flattened and somewhat worn, but that W has the traditional serif splitting. There are a number of doubled Kennedy hubs running around during the late 60s—as Silviosi and others have discussed—but that coin is worth investigating as one of the three listed DDOs. Unfortunately, VV doesn't markers for most of those coins.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
134 Posts |
@Dearborn.these are 2coins. The exact order from the original pics at the top of the post.
Thank you
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Brandmeister, Quote: Doubled dies don't happen on hand punched mint marks Please elaborate. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
877 Posts |
John1, what I think Brandmeister was trying to explain is that any apparent doubling of the MM is usually a RPM. As the MM is hand punched on the die, it is not a result of hub doubling. However, a doubled die can have a RPM, which serves as an excellent marker on a doubled die. I think that was the intended point. Could be wrong though.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6531 Posts |
Dowhat is correct in his interpretation of my post. Hub doubling (HDO/HDR/SDO/SDR) and die doubling ( DDO / DDR/TDO/TDR/QDO/QDR) are separate from mint mark doubling from repunched mint marks (RPM). In the pre-1990s era when mint marks were punched by hand into the die, that was done as a final step, after the die hubbing was complete. At the point when the mint mark was added, the die was already either doubled or not, completely independent of the mint mark getting manually hammered into the die surface. The original post is asking if the coins in question are tripled die obverse coins. But the focus of the discussion became the mint marks. The mint marks have no bearing on the TDO diagnosis. The conclusion that the coins were nothing interesting based on the mint marks is, in my opinion, the wrong conclusion. The second coin—and possibly the first coin—show a degree of genuine doubling on the W and possibly other letters. Whether that doubling is the more common (and less valuable) hub or series doubling, versus more a more valuable minor or major doubled die, should be carefully analyzed.
|
| |
Replies: 19 / Views: 1,116 |