| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 833 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
149 Posts |
Curious if there is a possibility that some '43 copper cents were held onto and stamped over with a '45? Edited by coinhusker26 02/18/2024 10:14 pm
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74237 Posts |
Never heard of that before. I am not aware of any.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
149 Posts |
I'm just wondering if it ever could have happened. I realize it doesn't exist, but just curious if that's something the mint could or would have done. Would be easy to cover them that way with the small 4 and thick 5 over that 3.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10547 Posts |
In numismatics anything can happen but don't bet on it.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
I have never heard of that, and I don't think the mint would do anything like that. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United Kingdom
17942 Posts |
Considering how widely known the 1942/1 dimes are, it would be very surprising if any 1945/3 cents exist, as surely they would have come to light by now.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96214 Posts |
a '43/'45 overdate? I have heard of overdates happening from coin that were 1 year apart, not 2 years. But here's the thing overdated coins happened when the DIES were re-dated, not left over coins. It is next to impossible to exactly align an existing coin to strike up from 2 different attempts and have all the devices line up so perfectly that you cannot tell that were re-struck (with exception of the date , that is)
So to answer your question if 'left over' coins in the mint were restruck with a new date, my answer is a resounding NOPE.
Edited by Dearborn 02/19/2024 12:13 pm
|
|
Forum Dad
 United States
24161 Posts |
Quote: In numismatics anything can happen but don't bet on it. Just to clarify. That is soooooo 100% not true. We tell newbies that all the time "Sorry but no, your vise job is impossible to have happened during the minting process." Sound familiar?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Seem a bit of a stretch. 
Edited by Coinfrog 02/19/2024 10:22 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
54282 Posts |
Quote: some '43 copper cents were held onto and stamped over with a '45? No. If you really read that question; first you'd have to have a '43 copper cent.
Show your financial support of the Coin Community Family (click here)See my topic on Mexican Numismatic Medals (click here)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
As Dearborn states above, if a coin was struck and somehow got back to the planchet line and struck again, it would have to line back up perfectly in the dies. If it didn't you would have two different impressions.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
I think a struck coin would not fit into the die chamber because a struck coin enlarges after it is struck. John1 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
149 Posts |
This was all just curiosity. I have this 45 that I'm assuming has PMD and just happens to look somewhat like that. And it just got me thinking how crazy of a coin that would be and if that would ever even be possible. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96214 Posts |
Ah, ok. I see where you were going here. But this just looks like circulation flattening to me.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 833 |
|