| Author |
 Replies: 10 / Views: 1,018 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
373 Posts |
    i think this is a rpm I can see splits but is it to miner to keep ? thanks co
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
I don't know about anyone else but I would keep it  John1  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
373 Posts |
i cant tell if its that one but I will keep it since there is only one list on coppercoins and it is a rpm right?
thanks
colleen
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
The site's image doesn't show the tops of the date to do an overlay. But the location yours looks further south? Chuck may want it sent in. Let's see what he says about it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
Yes, definitely an RPM, and ALL RPMs from 1983 are scarce! That's definitely not the lighting, and yes, I would like to see that one. But send it first class this time. No need to send it faster.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2177 Posts |
Chuck, on your site I see an 83 rpm that's valued at 1$ in Fine. I would think that an rpm on an 83 being scarce would give it a higher value.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
For a 1983 cent to be in fine condition, it would have to have gone through an excessive amount of non-ordinary wear. In that grade it would be one of the lowest grade examples known, making it virtually worthless.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
In other words, 99% of all 1983 cents are either damaged and non-collectible anyway or are well above VF in condition. Almost all examples I see in my searches are either EF or AU, if not uncirculated. The F condition part of the scale on the site was intended mainly for earlier coins.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
Nice find!  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2177 Posts |
Thanks for the quick response and clear answer CC. |
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,018 |
|
Posted 04/28/2009 6:58 pm
