Author |
Replies: 20 / Views: 1,854 |
Valued Member
Canada
230 Posts |
I need your help on this one. This is a 1962 5 cents with only 2.22 grams. Normal weight should be 4.54 gr. We observe a weak strike which is the result of the thinner planchet. The coin is magnetic. I tried to find without success foreign coins that fit those caracteristiques and produced by the Mint at that time. If it's not strike on a foreign planchet, that could be a thin planchet. Thanks for your suggestions.   Edited by SP67 08/16/2024 5:14 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
162841 Posts |
Very interesting. 
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5294 Posts |
An XRF would help and would narrow your research
|
Valued Member
 Canada
230 Posts |
I know. Just need to find XRF instrument around Quebec City.
My first is pure nickel.
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
94367 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5294 Posts |
Contact TCNC auctions they probaly has one or they will know who has one in the area
|
Valued Member
 Canada
230 Posts |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
58626 Posts |
Standing by. 
Errers and Varietys.
|
New Member
Canada
21 Posts |
Very nice!
Sometimes hunting down information is half the fun.
|
Moderator
 Canada
10436 Posts |
Quote: I tried to find without success foreign coins that fit those caracteristiques and produced by the Mint at that time. Aside from the Jamaica strike after WW1 and Newfoundland, the Royal Canadian Mint did not start producing coins for other countries until 1970. Your coin was struck on a planchet that was split before the strike. The nickel 5c planchets back then were produced from nickel powder by the Sherritt Mint, and sometimes they were prone to splitting. Most examples I know of were split after the strike, but I have seen an few examples like yours, all from 1962.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: https://creativecommons.org/license...0/deed.en_USMy ebay store
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
58626 Posts |
Great find! 
Errers and Varietys.
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
868 Posts |
Wow! Noce split planchet and a great find! I had never heard that 1962 nickels had this issue. Now I want one to add to my collection lol.
|
Moderator
 United States
162841 Posts |
Quote: Your coin was struck on a planchet that was split before the strike. The nickel 5c planchets back then were produced from nickel powder by the Sherritt Mint, and sometimes they were prone to splitting. Most examples I know of were split after the strike, but I have seen an few examples like yours, all from 1962. Excellent! 
|
Valued Member
 Canada
230 Posts |
Thank you SPP-OTTAWA for the detail explanation.
I was close with my thin planchet option, but the split planchet is much more better.
We can clearly see the powder granularity on the reverse.
Case Closed !
|
Valued Member
 Canada
230 Posts |
Do we know the period of time where Sherritt produced planchets for the RCM?
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1443 Posts |
When you are very lucky you find both halves 38 years after they were struck!!  
Edited by Zonad 08/19/2024 9:37 pm
|
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 1,854 |