| Author |
 Replies: 26 / Views: 2,887 |
|
New Member
United States
7 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 Either glue or PMD but not a mint error. John1  |
|
New Member
 United States
7 Posts |
these are some close ups how would his face get on the coin multiple times if it wasnt done at the mint    the quarter is very indented where the shape is. please explain cause I don't understend |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74060 Posts |
Looks like glue is on the coin. Try giving it a soak in 100% pure acetone, to see if it comes off.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1489 Posts |
Heat, possibly a small blow torch, may have rippled the metal in that area? Definitely PMD, though. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
 to the CCF! |
|
Moderator
United States
95740 Posts |
to CCF. the reverse in that area looks bulged out a bit - I'll go with simple impact damage. (maybe heat) |
|
New Member
United States
7 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1791 Posts |
You make a post looking for help and then call the experts dumb? Keep in mind what they see is from the images presented and that they don't have the coin in hand. The idea that the coin was triple struck is just wrong. Business strike coins are struck once and if it happened not to eject, the whole obverse would be struck again - not just part of it. I recommend you read up on this site: https://www.error-ref.com/ |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1770 Posts |
Sometimes people can be wrong, but as Seeker said, they are giving you their opinions based on the pictures you post, and unfortunately there are too much light on it so the coin doesn't show what you are seeing or what you want they see.
We are not paying anything in the forum, they are here taking their time to help us for free, they kindly and with respect give us their opinions. So next time can you be more kind and respectful please?
gigi2110
Edited by gigi2110
08/17/2024 02:17 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1464 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1770 Posts |
igwt79  gigi2110
|
|
Moderator
United States
56855 Posts |
Tmthyalex2, You are going to have to be patient and polite if you want the members' help.Also,way too many photos and too much glare. John1 |
|
Valued Member
United States
392 Posts |
Keep in mind, many of the people who are here to help have decades of viewing millions of coins. Their advice is valuable.
That's why we ask them. That is why we respect their opinions and never call them names.
|
|
New Member
United States
7 Posts |
Yall are so quick to dismiss everything unusual. yall just like the letters PMD. There is no way some torch did double letters and a second nose. there is also no discoloration on the coin at all, how can this be explained. on the second stamp and 3rd u can see the lines from washingtons forehead indented into the second image. Maybe actually check out the pics, because if you did zoom in a little you would see it plain as day. so what made raised lines in the exact shape of the edge of his face, what made the 2 extra Os or the doubling in all the state letters. why does the blank spot have forehead lines in it and how is that made PMD as yall say         And stop being so sensitive |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2736 Posts |
It is actually a genuine error. It was struck through a very thin, multi-struck metal layer. These generate correctly-facing incuse design elements, which is what is seen on his coin.
Error coin writer and researcher.
|
| |
Replies: 26 / Views: 2,887 |
Posted 08/16/2024 8:23 pm
