| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,469 |
|
Valued Member
Canada
77 Posts |
Edited by jackson12345
01/03/2025 10:24 am
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5644 Posts |
It looks, to me, as post-mint damage from who knows what.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Can we see the other side, please.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
743 Posts |
Without seeing the other side it could be struck through some piece of metal. I don't see any track marks or gauge extra metal you might see if it was dug in from one direction to another.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
194816 Posts |
Interesting find.  I agree, seeing the other side will help. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1632 Posts |
Looks like a strike-through to me
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1163 Posts |
To me it looks like a legit strike through. I found this 10 cent with the fragment imbedded, there are similarities like banana shape. If the fragment was still intact it would have been worth more, you have to convince the buyer your coins legit not intentionally done.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21859 Posts |
The gouge is on the Obverse, not the Reverse.
Looks like a nice struck through as there is no evidence
of any displaced metal. Good find.
|
|
Moderator
Canada
10473 Posts |
Not a Type 4, it is a Type 3 (Large Beads, Blunt 5). It is a strike through error. Quote:
Effect on value? Significant, a normal BU Type 3 1965 is worth about 25-cents (or less), but that is easily a CAN$20 error in my opinion. Possibly more, if two guys want to fight over it in an auction. "Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Moderator
Canada
10473 Posts |
Quote:
...you have to convince the buyer your coins legit not intentionally done . Not to an error collector. It is definitely a legit strike through error. I'd buy that in a heartbeat if I saw it on ebay or at a coin show. "Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3208 Posts |
That's a whopper! Very nice find.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1163 Posts |
Main reason I posted that 2008 coin is compare both coins strike throughs raggy jagged edges. That 1965 one is totally legit. Metal fragments are raggy - jaggy and it matches in many ways.
|
|
Moderator
United States
194816 Posts |
I enjoyed reading the additional information that was posted.  |
|
Valued Member
 Canada
77 Posts |
Thank you to everyone for helping to educate a newcomer! In was expecting some harsh comments but not so. You've encouraged me to return with other oddities!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
78339 Posts |
Great find! Nice Struck Through. Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5418 Posts |
Change the title . The error is not on the reverse.
Struck through on the obverse .
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,469 |
Posted 01/03/2025 08:45 am
