| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 931 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1217 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
With diamonds like that I suppose it's technically low AU, though to me it has an EF-45 look overall.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1866 Posts |
nice strike---imo not worth having graded---
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
877 Posts |
That's a very nice looking IHC. not my area, but if I had to guess, I'd say low AU.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187702 Posts |
A nice example! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73688 Posts |
I'll guess low AU as well.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36558 Posts |
Looks like an EF-45 to me.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Whatever the grade, one choice-looking coin!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
250 Posts |
Based on Rick Show's YouTube video, it looks AU. PCGS photograde pictures also agree. 4 diamonds first appears at AU 55.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
It technically grades AU, it just doesn't looks AU. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
250 Posts |
Yes I agree. It is a little dull and some sort of retained mint luster would be a plus.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8515 Posts |
AU53.Snow 19 I think.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
It has AU level sharpness but the hit on the date, and to the right of it, is a concern. Should straight grade as a low AU.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18638 Posts |
AU50 or 53. I'm leaning 53. surfaces are a little dull to make 55 imo.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 931 |
|