| Author |
 Replies: 15 / Views: 823 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
90 Posts |
Would appreciate any thoughts on the grade of this 1885-O Morgan dollar. Thanks in advance.   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5533 Posts |
It's not bad but light over the ear with some slight cheek marks and fingerprint on reverse - I think 64 is the max on this coin!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
216 Posts |
Looks AU58 and possibly cleaned to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5533 Posts |
Quote:
Looks AU58 and possibly cleaned to me. Remember to tell us why you think that - It's very important to hear to determine a correct grade!
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
90 Posts |
Quote:
It's not bad but light over the ear with some slight cheek marks and fingerprint on reverse - I think 64 is the max on this coin! Thanks very much for the reply and feedback. That makes sense and definitely light above the ear. Too bad about the fingerprint, too! Otherwise it's pretty nice in-hand.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
58486 Posts |
I'll guess MS-64.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
216 Posts |
The rub above the ear and on the cheek look like wear to me. There may be light wear on the eagle's breast feathers as well, hard to tell from the pics.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10916 Posts |
From those pics I'll go MS63. It could have a couple rubs but the overall appearance likely puts in an MS holder (if graded). Nice common date pre-'21 Morgan.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
250 Posts |
Looks like a decent toning to me. Am I wrong ? Also Morgan reverses really appeal to me. They seem to strike out much better.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10945 Posts |
58 as the cheek looks rubbed. Attractive looking and well struck for the date/mm.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
216 Posts |
Same page club NuStu. Nice strong strike that shows the slight wear more easily. I could be wrong, but I'd rather be wrong up than down.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
90 Posts |
Thanks to all for the comments and insight. Much appreciated.
I have to admit that this coin and the 1878-S Morgan (just posted separately) were my first actual purchases after inheriting a large collection and learning (slowly) over the past few years, mostly from the CCF community. Overall, I'm pretty happy with the coins! Although I did think this 1885-O was uncirculated when I got it, it still looks nice with some subtle toning toward edges.
Anyway, thanks again everyone.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1526 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
90 Posts |
Thanks for that suggestion. I'll try that paper test as you suggest. In the meantime, here is just one more photo showing the cheek and above the ear in different light.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4970 Posts |
Slider since cheek exhibits signs of rub. I'll say AU-58 to be safe.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4389 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 823 |
|
Posted 04/24/2025 8:55 pm
