| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,294 |
|
|
New Member
United States
22 Posts |
|
|
|
|
New Member
 United States
22 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6464 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21589 Posts |
Looks like it may have taken a hit that deformed it. There is no way that could happen when it was minted. There are thousands of things that can happen to a coin after it is struck and most times unless you were there, you may never know how it happened. It doesn't really matter though as damage is damage.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34397 Posts |
I agree that it sure looks like damage. Sometimes mintmarks seem deformed due to die chips or doubling in many different forms, but yours doesn't really look like that.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73798 Posts |
I agree, just damage. PMD.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95018 Posts |
It appears to be damaged, I cannot tell if this is a type 1 or 2 MM.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
617 Posts |
Could be a Type 1, filled "S"
|
|
New Member
 United States
22 Posts |
First and foremost, I want to thank all the contributers for your opinions and comments. I see that the consensus is that what I am seeing is PMD. A big shout out to @Errers and Varietys for the link to explain what PMD stands for, Post Mint Damage! I also want to give a hardy THANKS to @Brandmeister for the link to pcgs images. I went through all 52 "S" pictures, LOL, #41 is a P and found that none of them were what I would call clear and distinct S mint marks, in fact some were nearly un-readable. Neither did any of them match my S mark. Having studied all 51 images of the S mint marks in the highest resolution by clicking the download in the upper right corner and place the magnifier over the mint mark and click, I'm fairly convinced it is NOT anything special, but is likely a messed up mint mark from minting. Again, after examining all 51 images, virtually none of them have a clean S, in fact the P on #41 is a cleaner mark, IMHO, than any of the 51 S marks. Please, I encourage you to look at all 51 of them for yourself and see how many of those you feel are from the mint and how many may be PMD's. I am currently under the impression that none of those mint marks are PMD, but I'm open to your opinions to change my mind! Along those lines, I only found 2 images, # 9 & 10, to have the same mint mark. All 49 of the remaining S's were differant, ranging from #25 that was IMHO the worst to # 15 & 16 that were amoung the cleanest. #'s 3, 7, 8, 25, 27, 34, 35, 37, 39 and 47 I think had some minor resemblance to the coin I have. Thanks again for all your help and comments! 
|
|
New Member
 United States
22 Posts |
 Another quick note, after asking Google AI what was the difference between a type 1 and type 2 S mark and seeing examples of both on PGCS, I'm convinced that all 51 of the S images I looked at are type 1. Not a single one of them were a "clear and distinct" S, like in the picture on PGCS of the type 2 from the new die used to stamp the type 2's. As always, feel free to share you opinions and if needed, correct mine! 
Edited by thbjr 05/25/2025 11:15 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6464 Posts |
LOL, I think Google AI sent you on a wild goose chase. You have a business strike 1979-S dollar. To the best of my knowledge, there is only one S mint mark punch used on those coins. The type 1 and type 2 San Francisco mint mark is restricted to proof strikes only for 1979, at least for SBA dollar coins. https://www.ngccoin.com/news/articl...g%20to%20the
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1259 Posts |
 Thanks for the link Brandmeister... Very helpful
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95018 Posts |
oh yeah, I forgot about that - thanks Brand!
|
|
New Member
 United States
22 Posts |
Quote:The type 1 and type 2 San Francisco mint mark is restricted to proof strikes only for 1979, at least for SBA dollar coins. See, I knew I could be un-convenced.  Thanks for the info @Brandmeister 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6464 Posts |
LOL, I went through three rounds of trying to buy a 1981-S type 1 and 2 proof nickel. Ultimately, I ended up with three or four of one type and zero of the other, and put that folder on the shelf. Those are harder to tell apart, though. =)
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187702 Posts |
Quote:The type 1 and type 2 San Francisco mint mark is restricted to proof strikes only for 1979, at least for SBA dollar coins. The Red Book shows this as well, which is a good reason one everyone should have one. 
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,294 |
|