Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1957 Nickel Die Chip On Obverse

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 374Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
338 Posts
 Posted 01/09/2026  10:17 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Rubduck to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers

Sorry, I posted this on the wrong forum, this is where I want the post.This, this is the same nickel, on the other forum.But I found something else on it



1957-Nickel-Die-Chip-On-Obverse
1957-Nickel-Die-Chip-On-Obverse
1957-Nickel-Die-Chip-On-Obverse
1957-Nickel-Die-Chip-On-Obverse
Bedrock of the Community
Errers and Varietys's Avatar
United States
73688 Posts
 Posted 01/09/2026  12:11 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Errers and Varietys to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Could it be a Lamination or Struck Through?
Errers and Varietys.
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
94786 Posts
 Posted 01/09/2026  12:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dearborn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I saw the you also posted it in the Grading forum - and that is fine to get the question that you want from there.

It looks like a die chip on the images you posted here, could also be a lamination as stated by EV above, but some folks may want to call it a rim Cud. - it could also be that because it is attached to the rim, But a Cud forms when a portion of the die on the edge falls away, and I can still see the full rim, so lets see what the others have to say.
Valued Member
United States
338 Posts
 Posted 01/09/2026  1:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Rubduck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Sounds like a plan and also just like, no.This is the same nickel as on the other platform.I didn't know that I can put that error on there.It was mistake, but thank you.Verdi information, you're very knowledgeable person and I appreciate it.I look forward to hearing other people.Should I clean it?I did not clean the coin. just that's the way there's
Pillar of the Community
Tunnioc's Avatar
United States
3170 Posts
 Posted 01/09/2026  1:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Tunnioc to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
If it's not crud, it could be a Cud.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1238 Posts
 Posted 01/09/2026  2:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add snailking1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Perhaps a folded Rim Fin?
Would a Cud have a jagged edge like that?
Edited by snailking1
01/09/2026 2:02 pm
Valued Member
United States
338 Posts
 Posted 01/09/2026  2:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Rubduck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Should I take a closer photo
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 374Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.28 seconds to rattle this change. Forums