Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

A 1982 D With Obverse Doub.

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 967Next Topic  
Valued Member
joe finds's Avatar
United States
347 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2009  07:00 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add joe finds to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
did I mention that my eyes are tired of this but my brain is'nt!
This "doubling is on the date, lib (B), and, "I-G-W-T"
Any words? ? ?
A-1982-D-With-Obverse-Doub.
A-1982-D-With-Obverse-Doub.
A-1982-D-With-Obverse-Doub.
!! JUST FOUND A BETTER ONE !
Rest in Peace
numismo's Avatar
United States
3039 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2009  07:37 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add numismo to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Sorry, but I don't thimk it's a dd. We'll let the big guys opine on this one. I still get fooled periodically. When I started looking for errors I was excited about everything that looked out of the ordinary until I learned about Machine Doubling, Die Deterioration and normal striking nuances.
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2009  08:33 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm no pro but it looks like ejection doubling to me.
John1
Pillar of the Community
copper nickel daddy's Avatar
United States
2224 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2009  10:15 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add copper nickel daddy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Could also be the result of a deteriorating die, but most likely not actual doubling.
Pillar of the Community
rockdude's Avatar
United States
1807 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2009  10:27 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add rockdude to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Not a Doubled Die.
Valued Member
coincollectingkid's Avatar
United States
323 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2009  2:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coincollectingkid to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yea, it doesn't really look like a doubled die just Machine Doubling, don't feel Stupid though, I asked the same question on a 1983 reverse with the response " Machine Doubling"
Pillar of the Community
garylcsr's Avatar
United States
1952 Posts
 Posted 07/11/2009  01:05 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add garylcsr to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
first welcome to the forum. second you are looking way too close. using a 40-60X microscope you will find things that are not there.
if your using a high power scope I would set it aside and get a 20X30X. that's what I use and I have not found anything that wasn't there. but if you look hard enough be surprised what you find, but is it worth anything? in this case no.
Gary
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 967Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.22 seconds to rattle this change. Forums