| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 7,463 |
|
|
New Member
Australia
49 Posts |
Please can some one help. Spotted an Albanian 100 Franc dated 1927 in gold at a local coin shop,the coin has Amet Zogu facing right with a man ploughing a field with 2 cows,virtually the same coin as the 5 franga but 100 franc in gold and the word Prova on the back,does anyone have any reference to this coin,cannot find it when I google,only the 100 franc facing left with a different reverse?
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16808 Posts |
It's listed in Krause under the "prova" section at the back of the listing for Albania, KM# PrA32, listed at $2000 in my 2006 edition Krause; mintage unreported. As a comparison, regular 100 franga ari are listed at $1500-$1600 in Unc.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
SAP - Perhaps you can explain something to me. Prova means proof or proving (testing) in Italian - but in numismatics I thought a Prova referred to a pattern or test type coin and not to a regular issue? Yet in Krause there are listings under Albania for both Patterns and Provas. I can not locate the technical distinction between the terms. Do you know?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
My current copy of Krause lists PrA32 as a silver coin struck in Vienna. No listing for this coin in gold. Prova is a proof coin. This may be a rare gold proof or more than likely a gold plated silver PrA32.
|
|
New Member
 Australia
49 Posts |
i got a picture 
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16808 Posts |
Hmm. Numismaster lists PrA32 as "silver", but the price listed in my catalogue is clearly for a gold coin (the other 100 franga ari provas also are given a value of $2000. I suspect the "silver" entry is an error, and it's actually gold - especially with the evidence of an actual gold coin.
Swamperbob, I'm not too sure of the difference between a "pattern" and a "prova" either. Provas seem to be less valuable; perhaps they were made for sale to collectors, or made for distribution to legislators as a demonstration piece, rather than an internal test coin which is what I always understand a "pattern" to be.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
It appears that the catalog is incorrect, coin is indeed gold. Looks like it has seen some circulation also.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
I would be very curious to see the results of an specific gravity test on that coin. A Prova with such soft features and apparent wear is on the fringe of "believable", in my opinion. It appears to be gold but very soft gold otherwise - it endured a LOT of circulation just at a point in time 1927-1933 when I would never expect that to happen. The world economic problems saw gold hoarded FAST starting in 1929. That gives two years for circulation of a high denomination gold coin (a presentation coin at that). Does that seem unlikely to anyone else? The coin appears to have significant pocket time under it's belt so to speak. Could it have been a lucky piece? My concern is that it might not be COIN gold but possibly a casting in 0.999 fine gold which is mushy with slight circulation. It could also be a casting from a degraded or poorly made transfer mold.
So I need to ask 2 followup questions; Is the edge correct? Can you get a picture?
I also noticed another feature that makes me suspicious. Have you checked the letter N in SHQIPNI closely? You need to use a binocular microscope. To my eye the coin looks like it possibly has a doubled impression in that letter and the adjacent one. Any doubling would make me get a bit suspicious of the coin being original. The dies used to make the coins should have been top notch and doubling of the image is often seen as poor quality. But doubling is ALSO FAR MORE COMMON on transfer impressions.
Also on the N itself, it appears that the upright on the left side of the letter is cut into the die DEEPER than the diagonal bar (because of the shadow line) - a feature like that in a letter is often a signal of engraving as opposed to punching in the preparation of the die. The die punches are typically cast and hardened AFTER the face of the letter or numeral is ground absolutely flat and smooth. This results in a letter or numeral with the surface at ONE LEVEL. But a multi-level letter can also be seen on many transfer dies because the forgers strengthen the details near the edge (where pressure reduces and details transfer poorly).
Now this may simply be a shadow caused by some odd lighting effect, but in my opinion the face of a letter typically should be at one level. I know NOTHING about this coin so I do not know for certain a letter like this would be wrong. But unless you know for certain that the die punch used to create the N had a bi-level face (REALLY HARD TO MAKE by the way) - I would be very suspicious.
|
|
New Member
 Australia
49 Posts |
Gee your guys are good,what a wealth of knowledge,i have 4 days to figure whether I buy or not,its weight is approx 31.5 grams and its not much above spot pricewise,its an expensive gamble
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
neal - If the coin is really gold then the price is good and it is worth the risk. But if it is not gold the price would be far too high.
The weight 31.5 grams seems to match the wear level but also confirms my belief about the amount of time that level of wear would have taken. That is over 2% of total weight.
Therefore, a Specific Gravity is critical at this point. If the coin dealer has a decent scale you could do a rough SG right in the shop. Weigh the coin and confirm the weight of 31.5 grams. Then weigh the coin while it is hanging in water. Gold is so dense SG over 19 when pure that 10% alloy drops the SG to just over 16. So a very rough in store SG can be useful.
|
|
New Member
 Australia
49 Posts |
Thanks Swamperbob,i have bought about 50 gold coins from the same source over the last week,the coin was part of a larger lot of 200 coins that came from the same collector,will repost weights and better pics in the coming week if it comes to fruition,thanks again for all your help
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 7,463 |
|