| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 1,302 |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
mine is graded 67 but even though the pictures are blurry a little, knowing how sharply most 79-S Morgans are struck and how allot of them were cared for I will say this one is probably a 64 (because the scratch on the cheek) and may be s high as a 66 but I am not comfortable saying that high with the pictures provided
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
Sorry about the pictures, I'm terrible at taking pictures.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2797 Posts |
I'll split the difference and say MS65.
You're having some issues with your light source and the color balance. Try lighting from above rather than the side or use another light on the right. Experimenting will eventually get you the results you're looking for.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
Quote:
Sorry about the pictures, I'm terrible at taking pictures. I wasn't complaining, it is just hard to grade a coin from pictures that are less than perfect because every little thing can affect the grade and if you can't see those little things in the picture it is impossible to give an accurate grade |
|
Valued Member
United States
272 Posts |
My first guess was MS64 also.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
461 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
The weakness in the hair should hold this one to 64. I could see it going 63 even; depending on how flashy (or not) it is in hand.
|
|
Moderator
United States
16677 Posts |
PCGS MS64
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Moderator
United States
23731 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
I feel safe saying that CAC would not sticker that coin. For a common date Morgan that is normally very well struck, that is a weak 65.
If it is your coin echizento, no offense intended!
|
|
Moderator
United States
23731 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,302 |
|
Posted 01/08/2010 12:07 pm
